Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Asbestos waste management services

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6799233
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€771,462
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
989 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Asbestos waste management services
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for asbestos waste management services presents a significant opportunity for experienced providers. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements creates ambiguity, but also allows for strategic differentiation. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, strong environmental compliance, and a clear understanding of the contracting authority's needs, while leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and compliant asbestos waste management with a focus on environmental stewardship.

Expertise in handling hazardous waste, ensuring safety and regulatory adherence.

Commitment to sustainable practices, aligning with Green Procurement objectives.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement to differentiate.
Addressing the lack of specified evaluation criteria by proactively defining value.
Demonstrating superior technical capability and operational efficiency due to the absence of explicit technical requirements.
Building a strong relationship with UAB 'VAATC' by understanding their specific needs and challenges.
Key Challenges
Ambiguity due to unspecified evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and submission requirements.

Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority. Develop a comprehensive bid that addresses all potential aspects of these requirements, focusing on best practices and industry standards. Assume a rigorous evaluation based on technical merit, price, and compliance.

Potential for high competition given the open tender type and the critical nature of the service.

Focus on clear differentiation through superior service delivery, strong environmental credentials, and a competitive pricing strategy. Highlight unique selling propositions beyond basic compliance.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and ESPD requirements.

Conduct thorough due diligence on all aspects of the ESPD and exclusion grounds. Assign dedicated resources to ensure accuracy and completeness of all submitted documentation.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced and certified asbestos waste management company with a proven track record in handling hazardous materials, a strong commitment to environmental sustainability, and the capacity to deliver reliable services within a 12-month timeframe. The ideal bidder will also possess efficient operational processes and a clear understanding of regulatory compliance in Lithuania.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds compliance
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) completion
Asbestos waste management service delivery
Compliance with Green Procurement principles
12-month contract duration adherence
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to and implementation of advanced green procurement principles in asbestos waste management.
Innovative (though not explicitly requested) approaches to waste minimization, recycling, or energy recovery within the asbestos waste stream.
Exceptional safety record and robust risk management protocols for hazardous waste handling.
Proactive and transparent communication strategy with the contracting authority.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local workforce where possible, providing training opportunities in hazardous waste management, and prioritizing suppliers with strong sustainability credentials for any sub-contracted services.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Detail extensive experience in asbestos waste management, including specific types of asbestos, handling procedures, transportation, and disposal methods. Provide evidence of certifications, licenses, and trained personnel. Emphasize adherence to all relevant Lithuanian and EU regulations.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing model that reflects the cost of compliant and sustainable asbestos waste management. Consider economies of scale and operational efficiencies to offer value for money without compromising quality or safety.

Green Procurement

Clearly articulate how the proposed service will meet and exceed green procurement objectives. This could include strategies for waste reduction, use of eco-friendly transportation, energy-efficient disposal methods, and responsible sourcing of materials.

Compliance and Risk Management

Provide a comprehensive overview of compliance procedures for all relevant environmental and safety regulations. Detail robust risk management plans, emergency response protocols, and insurance coverage.

Recommendations7
Thorough ESPD and Exclusion Grounds Review
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of all mandatory exclusion grounds and meticulously complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). Ensure all information is accurate, complete, and supported by verifiable documentation.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Proactive Clarification on Unspecified Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Submit formal requests for clarification to UAB 'VAATC' regarding the unspecified evaluation criteria, technical, financial, and submission requirements. This demonstrates engagement and allows for a more targeted bid.

Reduces ambiguity and allows for a more focused and competitive bid.
Highlight Green Procurement Expertise
HighHigh effort

Develop a detailed section showcasing specific initiatives and methodologies that align with and exceed 'Green Procurement' principles. Quantify environmental benefits where possible (e.g., reduced emissions, waste diversion rates).

Positions the bidder as a forward-thinking and environmentally responsible partner.
Develop a Robust Technical Capability Narrative
HighHigh effort

Even without explicit requirements, build a compelling narrative around technical expertise. Detail experience with various asbestos types, specialized equipment, trained personnel, and safe handling/disposal processes. Include case studies or testimonials if possible.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to perform the service effectively and safely.
Assume Rigorous Evaluation and Price Competitiveness
HighHigh effort

Given the lack of specified criteria, assume a comprehensive evaluation that includes technical merit, price, and compliance. Develop a pricing strategy that is competitive yet sustainable, reflecting the true cost of safe and compliant hazardous waste management.

Increases the likelihood of a favorable evaluation outcome.
Integrate Local Employment and Training
MediumMed effort

Include a commitment to local employment and training opportunities within the bid, particularly for roles related to hazardous waste handling. This adds a social value dimension beyond the explicit 'No' for social aspects.

Enhances the bid's overall value proposition and aligns with broader public sector objectives.
Proactive Risk Management and Safety Protocols
MediumMed effort

Detail comprehensive safety protocols, emergency response plans, and a strong track record in safety management. This is crucial for hazardous waste and can be a key differentiator.

Demonstrates a commitment to safety and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and environmentally conscious provider of asbestos waste management services in Lithuania. Emphasize a proactive approach to compliance and a commitment to exceeding 'Green Procurement' expectations. Highlight operational efficiency and a proven safety record to build trust and confidence.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Specialiosios konkurso sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios Konkurso salygos_ASBESTO ATLIEK...

This document contains the special conditions for an international public tender for asbestos waste management services, outlining requirements for bidders, proposal submission, and evaluation.

Atviro konkurso bendrosios salygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios 11-25 paskelbimui....

This document contains general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for asbestos waste management services, outlining definitions, provisions, and the composition of tender documents.

Pasiūlymo forma pirmai pirkimo daliaiDOC
Pasiulymo forma asbesto atlieku tvarkymui -fi...

This document contains a bid form for the first part of a tender for asbestos waste management services, requiring the bidder to provide their company details, confirm agreement with tender conditions, state the total bid price including VAT, and list any subcontractors.

Pasiūlymo forma antrai pirkimo daliaiDOC
Pasiulymo forma asbesto atlieku tvarkymui -fi...

This document is a bid submission form for the second part of a tender concerning asbestos waste management services, requiring the bidder to confirm compliance with tender conditions and provide pricing and information about subcontractors.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6799233.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for asbestos waste management services in Lithuania, with bids due by April 8, 2026.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a technical specification or form template related to asbestos waste management services, likely in an XML format.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6799233_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for asbestos waste management services.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 217.9 KB

This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to a tender for asbestos waste management services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for asbestos waste management services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. The procedure is open, and no disputes are noted. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context, though the submission deadline is relatively close to the opening date.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/eligibility requirements within the AI-extracted section reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and attached documents. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are missing from the AI extraction, impacting completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. All documents are accessible, and the value, while not disclosed, is not classified, suggesting transparency. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is positive.

Practicality65/100

E-procurement is indicated, which is practical. However, the AI extraction notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which can imply certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and EU open procedure
All required tender documents are available and analyzed
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in AI extraction
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all essential requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) are explicitly detailed and accessible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline