Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

J. Balčikonis Gymnasium school furniture and its installation (TŪM)

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6771305
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The procurement is divided into 3 separate parts: Part I - school furniture for the chemistry classroom; Part II
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for school furniture and installation presents a moderate competition opportunity. The primary evaluation criterion is lowest price, necessitating a highly competitive pricing strategy. Differentiation will come from demonstrating superior product quality, efficient installation, and a commitment to green procurement principles, even if not explicitly mandated.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective, high-quality furniture solutions with seamless installation, meeting all technical and environmental requirements.

Reliable partnership for equipping J. Balčikonio Gymnasium with modern and sustainable laboratory furniture.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 'Green Procurement' requirement to differentiate, even if not heavily weighted.
The tender is divided into 3 lots, allowing for focused bidding on specific parts or the entire package.
Opportunity to offer value-added services beyond basic supply and installation, such as furniture design consultation or lifecycle management.
Key Challenges
Evaluation criteria are not specified, with a strong indication of 'lowest price' evaluation.

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy by optimizing supply chain costs, production efficiency, and potentially offering bundled discounts for multiple lots. Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining the lowest bidder.

Lack of detailed technical capability, financial, and submission requirements in the provided AI summaries.

Thoroughly review all full tender documents (especially 'Pirkimo sąlygos') to identify all explicit and implicit requirements. Prepare comprehensive documentation for ESPD and all other submission components well in advance. Engage legal and technical experts to ensure full compliance.

Potential for high competition due to the open procurement type and the nature of school furniture supply.

Focus on clear and concise communication of value proposition, highlighting product quality, durability, and installation expertise. Emphasize any unique selling points related to materials, safety, or ergonomics for laboratory environments.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A furniture supplier with a proven track record in supplying and installing educational furniture, particularly for science laboratories. The ideal bidder should possess efficient manufacturing or sourcing capabilities to offer competitive pricing, robust project management for timely installation, and a strong understanding of sustainable materials and practices.
Key Requirements
Supply and installation of school furniture for chemistry, physics, and biology cabinets
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
Completion of European Single Procurement Document (ESPD)
Submission of a complete tender file
Compliance with 'Pirkimo sąlygos' (Terms and Conditions)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to sustainable materials and manufacturing processes, exceeding minimum green procurement expectations.
Exceptional track record in laboratory furniture installation, emphasizing safety, minimal disruption, and timely completion.
Innovative product features or material choices that enhance functionality, safety, or longevity in a science lab setting.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to using locally sourced materials where feasible, supporting the local economy in Panevėžys.
Offer training opportunities for local individuals in furniture assembly or installation as part of the project execution.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceLikely 100% or very high

Achieve the absolute lowest price through cost optimization across the supply chain, efficient production, and strategic sourcing. Consider volume discounts if bidding on multiple lots.

Technical ComplianceLikely 0% or pass/fail

Ensure all furniture specifications meet or exceed the requirements outlined in 'Pirkimo sąlygos'. Provide detailed product specifications and certifications.

Green ProcurementLikely low to medium, or pass/fail

Highlight any use of recycled, recyclable, or sustainably sourced materials. Detail energy-efficient manufacturing processes. Provide relevant certifications.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Pirkimo sąlygos'
CriticalHigh effort

The AI summaries are limited. It is imperative to download and meticulously review the full 'Pirkimo sąlygos' document to understand all technical specifications, material requirements, installation protocols, warranty terms, and any hidden clauses.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Develop a Highly Competitive Pricing Model
CriticalHigh effort

Given the likely 'lowest price' evaluation, focus on optimizing all cost components: material sourcing, manufacturing efficiency, logistics, and installation labor. Explore economies of scale if bidding on multiple lots.

Directly impacts the likelihood of winning the tender.
Emphasize Green Procurement Beyond Minimums
HighMed effort

Even if not heavily weighted, proactively highlight sustainable practices, materials (e.g., FSC-certified wood, low-VOC finishes), and eco-friendly manufacturing processes. This can be a subtle but effective differentiator.

Enhances brand image and appeals to environmentally conscious authorities.
Prepare Comprehensive ESPD and Supporting Documents
HighHigh effort

Ensure all sections of the ESPD are accurately completed and supported by the necessary documentation. This includes exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities, even if not explicitly detailed in AI summaries.

Prevents technical disqualification.
Clarify Ambiguities with the Contracting Authority
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documents remains unclear after thorough review, utilize the official communication channels to seek clarification from the Panevėžio miesto savivaldybės administracija. Document all communications.

Reduces the risk of misinterpretation and non-compliance.
Integrate Local Sourcing and Employment Commitments
MediumMed effort

Propose using local suppliers for components or offering apprenticeships/training to local residents during the installation phase. This aligns with broader public procurement goals.

Adds value beyond the core service and can be a positive factor in qualitative assessments if any exist.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential quality and safety standards for laboratory furniture. Highlight efficiency in installation to minimize school disruption.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

EBVPDZIP
EBVPD.7z

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request form, which is a standardized form used in public procurement procedures across the EU, requiring bidders to provide information about their economic and financial standing, technical capabilities, and exclusion grounds.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Balčikonio baldai. Sąlygos Nr.VPP-74.doc

This document contains the terms and conditions for a public procurement tender for school furniture and its installation, divided into three parts, with specific technical and environmental requirements.

NoticePDF
Notice_6771305.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the supply and installation of school furniture for chemistry, physics, and biology cabinets at J. Balčikonio Gymnasium in Panevėžys, Lithuania, divided into three lots.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6771305_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender for school furniture, divided into three parts, with a mandatory file submission required for evaluation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for school furniture and installation is well-structured with clear documentation and EU funding. However, it lacks disclosure of the estimated value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes necessary documents like ESPD and tender conditions. The CPV code is specified. There's no indication of disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure.

Clarity80/100

The description is clear regarding the subject matter (school furniture for subject cabinets) and the division into three lots. Required documents are identified. However, crucial evaluation criteria are missing, which impedes complete understanding.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV is present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with public access to documents, promoting fairness. The division into lots allows for specialized participation. The lack of disclosed value and specific, objective evaluation criteria slightly reduces fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. The contract duration is short (4 months). However, information regarding financing and a clear contract start date is not explicitly provided in the main tender notice, and e-submission is not explicitly confirmed.

No e-submission confirmed
Financing information not explicit
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender is active and valid for a reasonable period.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, aligning with broader European goals. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear subject matter and lot division
Use of ESPD and other standard documents
EU funded and E-Procurement indicated
Publicly accessible tender documents

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing explicit confirmation of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Confirm and detail the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline