Skip to main content
Tenders

Monitoring system (No.11255-1)

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6742315
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
5 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Vital signs monitoring system (17 vital signs monitors and central monitoring
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Priedas Nr.3 Kokybės kriterijai ir jų vertinimasDOC
Kokybės kriterijai ir jų vertinimas.docx

This document outlines the quality criteria and their evaluation methodology, detailing how bids will be assessed based on a combination of price and technical advantages to determine the most economically advantageous offer.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for a vital functions monitoring system, including technical specifications, contract draft, and qualification requirements.

Priedas Nr.5 Tiekėjo/subtiekėjo deklaracija dėl sankcijųDOC
Tiekėjo_subtiekėjo deklaracija dėl sankcijų.d...

This document is a supplier/subcontractor declaration confirming no Russian participation exceeding EU sanctions limits and adherence to Lithuanian international sanctions.

Priedas Nr.2 Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektasDOC
Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.docx

This document contains the draft of a public procurement contract, specifically the general and special conditions for the purchase and sale of goods, including definitions and rules of interpretation.

Priedas Nr.4 Europos bendrasis viešųjų pirkimų dokumentas (EBVPD)_pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning a vital signs monitoring system, requiring bidders to provide information about their economic operator status, legal representatives, and exclusion grounds.

NoticePDF
Notice_6742315.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of a patient monitoring system, including vital signs monitors and a central monitoring station, by the Vilnius University Hospital in Lithuania.

Priedas Nr.1 Techninė specifikacija ir pasiūlymo kainaXLS
TS ir pasiūlymo kaina_Monitoravimo sistema.xl...

This document contains the technical specification and pricing proposal for the vital functions monitoring system, with specific areas designated for bidder completion.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6742315_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission for vital signs monitoring systems, requiring a file upload.

Priedas Nr.4 Europos bendrasis viešųjų pirkimų dokumentas (EBVPD)XML
espd-request.xml

This document is a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request concerning a tender for a vital functions monitoring system, specifically asking about participation in criminal organizations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with adequate documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows standard open procedure and references EU directives. CPV code is provided and the organization is a public body. Missing reveal date is a minor procedural gap. Deadlines appear reasonable within context.

Clarity80/100

Technical specifications and contract drafts are provided, offering a good level of detail. However, the explicit statement of evaluation criteria for 'quality' is missing, making the assessment process less transparent.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the contract duration. The estimated value is notably absent, which is a significant omission. The total number of tender documents is specified.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The use of ESPD indicates a commitment to standardized fairness. E-procurement is specified. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of explicit, objective evaluation criteria for quality aspects raise concerns about full transparency.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and specifies e-procurement. However, the absence of direct URLs for documents and the lack of explicit financing information slightly reduce practicality. The contract duration is clearly stated.

No e-submission (implicitly, as URLs are missing)
No financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates seem logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding sources, which is a missed opportunity for a modern public tender.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear reference number and title
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Use of ESPD for bidder eligibility
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria for quality aspects
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender for increased transparency.
2. Clearly define and publish the specific evaluation criteria for quality aspects.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline