Skip to main content
Tenders

Bariatric Equipment Rental - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022726-2026
Value
£768,000
Location
Lancashire, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£768,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust wishes to contract with suitably qualified provider(s) for the provision and rental of Bariatric Equipment via a competitive flexible procedure.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bariatric equipment rental is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender utilizes a competitive flexible procedure, which is a recognized procurement method. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract start date. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the overall objective is understandable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific submission requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the absence of document content significantly reduce completeness.

No document content available
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The use of a competitive flexible procedure suggests an intention for fair competition. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation could lead to subjective assessments.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content hinder practical engagement for bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Open procedure type

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
No indication of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documentation with all necessary requirements and specifications.
3. Clarify the e-submission process for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline