Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of Command and Control Solution

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025536-2026
Value
£18,000,000
Location
East Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 27, 2026

Budget
£18,000,000
Duration
93 months
Location
East Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Police and Crime Commissioner for Nottinghamshire (the Contracting Authority) intend to award a Contract for the provision of a Command and Control Solution, as detailed in the ITT Statement of Requirement. The Contracting Authority seeks to engage with a strategic, innovative, and experienced Supplier capable of delivering a robust, future proof command-and-control system for Nottinghamshire Police. The solution must fully align with operational needs, enhance organisational efficiency, improve overall performance, and support compliance with all relevant standards and regulations. The required system should enable seamless integration with existing infrastructure and technologies, while also supporting continuous improvement across all departments that rely on command-and-control capabilities. The successful Supplier will be expected to work collaboratively with the Contracting Authority to ensure an effective and resilient implementation that meets current and future operational demands. For more information and access to the Tender documentation, please follow the link below: https://nottinghamshirepolice.my.site.com/s/Welcome

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (9)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must access tender documentation via the provided link: https://nottinghamshirepolice.my.site.com/s/Welcome
--[No other specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Must be a strategic, innovative, and experienced Supplier.
--Capable of delivering a robust, future-proof command-and-control system.
--Solution must fully align with operational needs.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements detailed in the provided text, beyond the general description of the solution]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements detailed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Command and Control Solution is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical capabilities, and the submission process relies heavily on an external link.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required solution is clear, outlining the need for a strategic, innovative, and experienced supplier. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of desired supplier attributes and system functionalities. However, the lack of specific technical capability requirements and evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are also specified. However, the lack of accessible tender document content and specific financial requirements impacts completeness.

No document content available
No specific financial requirements detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair by disclosing the estimated value and using a competitive procedure. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on supplier capabilities and solution attributes. The reliance on an external link for full documentation access is a minor concern for immediate transparency.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the submission process relies on an external link, and there is no explicit mention of e-submission functionality, which could impact practicality for bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
Reliance on external link for documentation access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, resulting in a moderate score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined organizational details
Specific estimated value and contract duration
Appropriate CPV code provided
General description of solution needs

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed technical capability requirements
Submission process relies on external link
No explicit mention of e-submission
Limited information on sustainability aspects

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Detail technical capability requirements to guide bidders more effectively.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure direct access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline