Skip to main content
Tenders

Milton Keynes College Tender for Supply of Confectionary Goods

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016862-2026
Value
£540,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 06, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£540,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Milton Keynes College are Tendering for the Supply of Confectionary Goods for the Catering Department

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for confectionary goods is generally well-structured with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is debatable given the lack of detailed documentation. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender is straightforward, and the basic information is present. However, the absence of documented requirements, specified criteria, and clear conditions for evaluation significantly reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the lack of attached documents with content and the absence of specified eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leave significant gaps.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed documentation and evaluation criteria makes it difficult for all potential bidders to assess the scope and requirements equally.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the availability of document URLs hinders practical application. Financing information is also not provided.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and duration specified
CPV code included

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Absence of e-submission and document URLs
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Include clear evaluation criteria and make tender document content accessible.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects and specify e-submission procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline