Skip to main content
Tenders

Learning Management System

Open
Deadline
38 days left
May 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025734-2026
Value
£384,000
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 28, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 05, 2026

Contract Start Date

January 01, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£384,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Learning Management System for the administration, documentation, tracking, reporting and delivery of electronic educational technology (also called eLearning) courses or training programmes, as well the scheduling, recording and reporting of practical (non-electronic) training. This will include operational and non-operational training.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear description of the required Learning Management System and basic financial and timeline information. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and has limited digital submission features.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by specifying a clear procedure, CPV code, and organizational details. Deadlines appear reasonable given the overall timeline. No disputes are reported. The procedure is 'Open procedure', which is standard. The lack of reveal date is a minor issue.

Clarity80/100

The description of the Learning Management System is clear and concise, outlining its purpose and scope. However, the absence of specified criteria for evaluation and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities significantly impacts clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific requirements provided for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities
Completeness70/100

Essential information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The contract start date is also provided. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and missing specific requirements sections reduce overall completeness.

No document content available
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria and the reliance on unspecified requirements could lead to a less fair competition. The lack of e-submission capability is also a drawback.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Practicality65/100

Key practical information like contract duration, start date, and estimated value is present. However, the lack of e-submission and the availability of only 0 documents with content limit the practicality for potential bidders. The absence of financing information is a minor concern.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. The timeline dates are logical, with a submission deadline preceding the contract start date. No suspension or disputes are noted, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of specific sustainability considerations within the tender documentation.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Clear description of the required system
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed

Concerns

Missing detailed requirements and evaluation criteria
Lack of document content available
No e-submission functionality
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed requirements for all categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial).
2. Specify objective evaluation criteria to ensure fair competition.
3. Consider implementing e-submission and providing comprehensive tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline