Skip to main content
Tenders

ICT Managed Service Provider - Ferguslie Park Housing Association

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
024961-2026
Value
£250,000
Location
West Central Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Budget
£250,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
West Central Scotland
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

FPHA are seeking to appoint a Managed Service Provider for their ICT Provision on a contract upto a maximum of 5 years.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for ICT Managed Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessed without context. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required ICT Managed Service Provider is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means that the exact conditions for selection are not fully documented, which could lead to ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value and contract duration (up to 5 years). However, the lack of content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair with disclosed value and objective criteria implied by the mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements. The use of e-procurement is noted. There are no immediate flags for tailored requirements to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs hinder practical access. Financing information and contract start date are not specified.

No e-submission
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Value disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential issues with e-submission
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Upload full tender documents with content.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline