Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of services for the adjustment of the Palanga City General Plan (in V2 district)

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6699945
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
23 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The planning objective is to refine the solutions for the planned and urbanizing territories with greater precision.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_6699945.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for architectural and related services for the correction of the Palanga city general plan in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6699945_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender, specifying an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation and a single lot, requiring a complete tender submission.

konkurso salygos.zipZIP
konkurso salygos.zip -- 150.0 KB

No content extracted

specialiųjų pirkimo sąlygų 5 priedas - EBVPD.zipZIP
specialiųjų pirkimo sąlygų 5 priedas - EBVPD.... -- 84.9 KB

No content extracted

specialiųjų pirkimo sąlygų 8 priedas - sutarties projektas.zipZIP
specialiųjų pirkimo sąlygų 8 priedas - sutart... -- 132.1 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for urban planning services in Palanga is generally well-structured, but lacks detailed requirements and specific sustainability considerations. Key financial information is missing, impacting the overall completeness and fairness of the process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure as per EU directives and uses a standard CPV code. However, the absence of a reveal date for submitted documents and unspecified evaluation criteria are minor procedural gaps.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement's purpose is clear, and the presence of a contract notice and tender structure XML provides a good foundation. However, detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not specified in the AI-extracted sections, which could lead to ambiguity.

Lack of specific requirements for eligibility, technical, financial, and submission
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and contract duration is present. The estimated value is not disclosed, and while documents are attached, content summaries for ZIP files are not extracted, hindering a full assessment of completeness. The lack of specific requirements also impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detailed requirements for bidders
Fairness85/100

The tender is described as 'active' and uses an open procedure, suggesting a fair approach. The availability of documents and the use of e-procurement are positive. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive for practical submission. However, a direct URL for document submission is not explicitly provided, and the lack of a specified contract start date, alongside the absence of clear financing information, reduces practicality.

No direct URL for e-submission provided
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The funding source is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a minimal focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and basic description provided
Standard open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Use of e-procurement
CPV code and NUTS code specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
No sustainability or innovation criteria
Missing contract start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Provide detailed requirements for bidder eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission process.
3. Incorporate specific evaluation criteria to ensure a fair and transparent selection process, including any sustainability or innovation aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline