Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

UKRI-5595 - Obesity Pathway Innovation Programme (OPIP) Community of Practice (CoP)

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019563-2026
Value
£600,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Budget
£600,000
Duration
35 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

To support grant-funded projects and the wider community of relevant stakeholders to communicate, collaborate and catalyse insights, an OPIP ‘Community of Practice’ is proposed to bring together and support projects in sharing their challenges, insights, learnings and solutions.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure and a specified CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No disputes are reported. The procedure is an open one, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the 'Community of Practice' is clear in its intent. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of accessible document content (0 documents with content/summaries) is a major gap, preventing a full assessment of requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria, while not fully specified, are not overtly tailored to specific companies. The lack of document content is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible document URLs hinder practical engagement for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open procedure for broad participation
Logical timeline and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible document content
No explicit mention of e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents accessible with content summaries or direct links.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline