Skip to main content
Tenders

Electrostimulation apparatus for pain relief

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6694127
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Electrostimulation apparatus for pain relief
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

1 Priedas Pasiūlymo forma (UŽPILDYTI).docxDOC
1 Priedas Pasiūlymo forma (UŽPILDYTI).docx -- 26.2 KB

No content extracted

2 Priedas Deklaracija dėl tiekėjo atsakingų asmenų.docxDOC
2 Priedas Deklaracija dėl tiekėjo atsakingų a... -- 35.6 KB

No content extracted

3 Priedas Sutarties projektas aktualu.docxDOC
3 Priedas Sutarties projektas aktualu.docx -- 48.3 KB

No content extracted

4 Priedas Elektrostimuliacijos aparato nuskausminimui.docxDOC
4 Priedas Elektrostimuliacijos aparato nuskau... -- 26.3 KB

No content extracted

6 Priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl (ne)atitikties Reglamento nuostatoms.docxDOC
6 Priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl (ne)atitikt... -- 16.0 KB

No content extracted

7 Priedas Prekių pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties bendrosios sąlygos.docxDOC
7 Priedas Prekių pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties ... -- 61.1 KB

No content extracted

BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI AK.docxDOC
BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI AK.docx -- 82.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6694127.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of electrostimulation apparatus for pain relief by the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital Kauno Klinikos.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6694127_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender for an electrostimulation apparatus for anesthesia, specifying it as an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation method.

5 Priedas EBVPD.zipZIP
5 Priedas EBVPD.zip -- 79.2 KB

This document contains various forms and specifications related to a tender for an electrostimulation apparatus for pain relief, including a bid proposal form, declarations, and technical specifications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an electrostimulation apparatus is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting its overall fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The main weakness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect legal compliance if not handled transparently during the evaluation phase.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. While specific requirements are not explicitly detailed in the AI-extracted section, the presence of 10 documents, including a contract notice and various forms, suggests that detailed requirements are likely contained within these documents. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a minor clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The AI-extracted requirements section is notably empty, implying that detailed requirements are solely within the attached documents, which might not be fully accessible or parsed.

Estimated value not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements section is empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with EU funding and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria for evaluation, though not explicitly stated, are expected to be objective in an open procedure.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI-extracted information does not confirm e-submission capabilities, and the contract start date is not specified. Financing information is also absent. The duration of 12 months is reasonable.

E-submission not explicitly confirmed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date, tender valid) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and EU directive adherence
Open procedure with e-procurement
Multiple relevant documents provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed AI-extracted requirements
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value for greater transparency.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline