Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of text validation models

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6692699
Value
€140,000
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€140,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
72
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€414,969
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
1,352 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement No. 20001
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Konkurso salygos_6692699ZIP
Konkurso salygos_6692699.7z

This document contains the general and special conditions for a service procurement contract, along with several appendices including a supplier/subcontractor declaration, a list of specialists, and a list of specialists' completed projects.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 83.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6692699.pdf

This document is a tender notice from Kaunas University of Technology for the development of document management software services in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 140,000 Euros.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6692699_1.xml

This document contains the structure of a tender, specifying it's an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation, for round 1, and requires a complete tender file to be submitted.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.8 KB

This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for tender Pirkimo Nr. 20001.

EBVPD_6692699ZIP
espd-request_6692699.zip

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request for tender procedure 20001, related to the creation of text validation models.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for text validation model development is adequately structured, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed technical/eligibility requirements, impacting clarity and completeness. The process benefits from e-procurement and EU funding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and is classified as 'active' with a defined submission deadline. No disputes or obvious regulatory non-compliance are indicated. The CPV code is specific. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental aspect of a fair legal process.

Missing evaluation criteria specified.
Clarity70/100

While the title and basic information are clear, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements significantly reduces clarity. The tender documents are available, but their content is not fully summarized, hindering immediate understanding of specific obligations.

No specific requirements provided for exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadline is present. However, critical details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical and financial capabilities, and submission procedures are not explicitly detailed within the provided AI-extracted requirements. The contract duration is short, which is specified.

AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, EU-funded, and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and there are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main detractor from a perfect fairness score is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality60/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the provided information does not explicitly mention e-submission functionality or provide direct URLs for document submission. The contract start date is not specified, and the short contract duration (2 months) might be impractical for complex model development.

No e-submission functionality explicitly mentioned.
Contract start date not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated and appear consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates provided (submission, opening) are logical. The contract duration is also clearly stated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded and uses e-procurement, which aligns with general modern procurement standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria mentioned.
No explicit social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value, deadline).
EU funded and e-procurement utilized.
Specific CPV code provided.

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
Short contract duration (2 months).

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Consider if the 2-month contract duration is sufficient for the scope of work.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline