Expertise services for the working project part of the construction of a new railway embankment on the "Rail Baltica" railway line section Kaunas-Panevėžys-LT/LV border, section Šėta – Ramygala 65.9 - 78 km (12.1 km)

This tender for expert services related to the Rail Baltica project is generally well-structured with a good set of supporting documents. However, it lacks transparency regarding the financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender utilizes a public negotiated procedure compliant with EU directives. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. Proper CPV code is provided, and no existing disputes or suspensions are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed through the procedure type.

The description of the service required is clear and specific, detailing the project segment and type of expertise. Numerous supporting documents are available, indicating a structured approach to defining requirements, although evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated.

Basic information like title, organization, and duration is present. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria means the completeness of the information for bidders is somewhat reduced.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement and appears to offer broad access to documentation. The main concern is the undisclosed estimated value, which can affect fairness in bid preparation. Objective criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to a less transparent process.

The tender specifies a contract duration and mentions EU funding. The presence of an e-procurement characteristic suggests digital submission is likely. However, the specific start date of the contract is not explicitly mentioned, and information on financing is limited to 'EU Funded'.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There is no indication of suspensions or disputes. Dates provided (submission, opening, tender validity) are logically structured.

The tender mentions 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain environmental and social standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability focus.