Skip to main content
Tenders

Disposable medical devices. Hemodialysis supplies

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6663971
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Disposable medical devices. Hemodialysis supplies
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygų spec. dalisDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų spec. dalis.docx

This document contains the specific conditions for a tender by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė for the procurement of single-use medical devices, specifically hemodialysis supplies, including delivery, with detailed technical requirements and submission guidelines.

Sutarties projektasDOC
Sutarties projektas_Hemodializės priemonės.do...

This document contains the draft contract for the purchase of single-use medical devices, specifically hemodialysis supplies, outlining general and special conditions, definitions, and the subject of the contract.

Pirkimo sąlygų bendroji dalisPDF
Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.pdf

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for the procurement of single-use medical devices for hemodialysis.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6663971.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of disposable medical devices for hemodialysis by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains ESPD request files in XML and PDF formats related to the tender for single-use medical devices for hemodialysis.

Pasiūlymo forma su technine specifikacijaXLS
Pasiulymo_forma.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form combined with technical specifications for the procurement of single-use medical devices, specifically hemodialysis products.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6663971_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission for disposable medical devices, specifically hemodialysis products, to be evaluated based on the lowest price.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.8 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning disposable medical devices for hemodialysis.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for hemodialysis supplies is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure compliant with EU directives. CPV code is provided, and the organization is a public body. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal requirement for transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. Key documents like the draft contract and technical specifications are available. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and while financing is implied by the public nature of the organization, explicit details are missing. The availability of 9 documents is positive.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Access to documents is provided, and the use of e-procurement is noted. Criteria are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern, but there are no obvious signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies. The disclosure of value is missing.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing details are absent, hindering practical planning for bidders.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The main inconsistency is the 'Checks' section flagging 'No e-submission' while 'Procurement Characteristics' lists 'E-Procurement'.

Inconsistency between 'Checks' and 'Procurement Characteristics' regarding e-submission
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure compliant with EU directives
Clear title, reference, and organization details
Comprehensive set of 9 tender documents available
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
3. Integrate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline