Skip to main content
Tenders

Parking Debt Management Services (Concession Contract)

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021241-2026
Value
£14,700,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

November 01, 2026

Budget
£14,700,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This procurement is for the Provision of Parking Debt Management Services; primarily for the collection of debt arising from unpaid PCNs and other parking related debt.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Parking Debt Management Services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract start date. No disputes are reported. The procedure is an open one, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, outlining the primary purpose of collecting parking-related debt. Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are mentioned, indicating a structured approach to defining needs.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the absence of accessible tender documents with content is a significant gap.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for bidders. The lack of explicit e-submission details is noted.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs limit the practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and basic description provided
Estimated value and duration specified
CPV code included

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender documents with content
Lack of explicit e-submission details
No sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Make tender documents accessible with content summaries.
3. Clarify e-submission process and provide necessary links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline