Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of support and development services for the Prosecutor's Office administration information system

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6607795
Value
€200,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€200,000
Duration
37 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€414,969
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
1,352 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority plans to acquire the Prosecutor's Office administration information system (PAIS).
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must be submitted by the specified deadline: 2026-03-27 10:00:00.
--The bid must be submitted in the language specified by the contracting authority (likely Lithuanian).
--All required declarations, technical proposals, and financial proposals must be complete and submitted according to the tender instructions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per public procurement law (e.g., conviction for specific offenses, non-payment of taxes/social security, bankruptcy).
--The bidder must declare that they are not in a situation of conflict of interest.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be legally established and registered to perform the services in their country of origin.
--The bidder must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must demonstrate relevant experience in providing software maintenance and development services for information systems, preferably for administrative or public sector systems.
--The bidder must propose a team of qualified personnel with appropriate technical expertise and experience in software development, maintenance, and project management.
--The bidder must demonstrate an understanding of the requirements for maintaining and developing a critical administrative information system (PAIS).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial standing to perform the contract.
--The bidder may be required to provide proof of financial stability, such as annual turnover or insurance coverage.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios sutarties sąlygosDOC
10 priedas Bendrosios sutarties sąlygos .docx

This document contains the general conditions for a service purchase-sale agreement, defining key terms, contract interpretation rules, and the hierarchy of contract documents for the acquisition of the Prosecutor's Administration Information System (PAIS).

Specialiosios konkurso sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains special tender conditions for the procurement of maintenance and improvement services for the Prosecutor General's Office's administrative information system, outlining general information, the object of procurement, national security requirements, and bidder qualification criteria.

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygosPDF
Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.pdf

This document contains the general conditions for an open public procurement tender, outlining definitions, general provisions, the procurement object, communication, supplier qualification requirements, offer submission and evaluation procedures, and contract conclusion.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 83.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6607795.pdf

This document contains a tender notice from the Lithuanian Public Prosecutor's Office for the procurement of maintenance and development services for its Administration Information System (PAIS), with an estimated value of 200,000 Euro.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document appears to be a binary file, likely a compressed archive, containing an ESPD request in both XML and PDF formats.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.6 KB

This document contains an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) request, which is a standard form used in public procurement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for IT system maintenance and development services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an open procedure, but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender procedure generally complies with EU/national regulations, and CPV codes are correctly assigned. The missing reveal date is a minor compliance gap, but the submission period from today's date appears reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Missing tender reveal date
Clarity60/100

While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, preventing bidders from fully understanding how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration, is provided. However, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria is a significant omission that impacts the overall completeness of the tender documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
Liable person not specified
Fairness50/100

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical issue for fairness, as it introduces subjectivity and prevents objective assessment of bids. While e-procurement is enabled and requirements appear generic, this omission severely undermines transparency.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

E-procurement is indicated, which is positive, but there's a contradiction with the automated check flagging 'No e-submission'. The contract start date is not specified, which can be a minor practical inconvenience. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the summary.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. automated check)
Contract start date not known
Data Consistency80/100

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The missing 'Liable Person' and 'Reveal date' are minor data gaps.

Liable person not specified
Missing tender reveal date
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is a missed opportunity for modern public procurement practices.

No green procurement aspects
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and standard eligibility and technical requirements
Open procedure type with EU directive reference
E-procurement enabled for broader access
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly stated
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided

Concerns

Critical absence of specified evaluation criteria
Missing tender reveal date, making deadline reasonableness hard to fully assess
Contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. automated check)
No explicit focus on sustainability, social aspects, or innovation
Liable person not specified

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure all relevant dates, including the reveal date, are explicitly provided.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation clauses in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline