Purchase of hippotherapy services (Public tender)

This tender for hippotherapy services is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks crucial details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions and the lack of explicit mention of dispute resolution mechanisms are minor omissions. The deadline, while short, is not inherently non-compliant without further context on typical procurement timelines for such services in Lithuania.

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is appropriately specified. The availability of multiple documents, although their content is not fully extracted here, suggests an effort towards providing necessary information. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Key information such as the title, reference number, organization, and contract duration are present. The tender is marked as active with a submission deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial sections like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are marked as 'No information provided', significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. The criteria for selection are not specified, which could lead to subjective evaluations. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, indicating a good level of fairness in this regard.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and the absence of a clear contract start date (beyond the submission deadline) reduce practicality. The short submission deadline also poses a practical challenge for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The tender is active with a clear submission and opening date. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a procurement process.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.