Skip to main content
Tenders

Echoscopes

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6576072
Value
€409,917
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€409,917
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Echoscopes
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-27 08:00:00.
--No other specific submission requirements were provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements were provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements were provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements were provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements were provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

2 priedas Specialiosios Prekių viešojo pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties sąlygosDOC
2 priedas Specialiosios Prekių viešojo pirkim...

This document contains Annex 2, which outlines the Special Conditions of the Goods Purchase-Sale Contract and includes a Goods Sheet to be filled in according to the awarded part of the procurement.

4 priedas TECHNINĖ SPECIFIKACIJA (užpildyti, patekti word formatu)DOC
4 priedas TECHNINĖ SPECIFIKACIJA (užpildyti, ...

This document contains the technical specifications for echoscopes, detailing requirements for five different types of echoscopes across various medical specialties and their respective quantities.

7 priedas DEKLARACIJA DĖL TIEKĖJO ATSAKINGŲ ASMENŲ (užpildyti)DOC
7 priedas DEKLARACIJA DĖL TIEKĖJO ATSAKINGŲ A...

This document contains a declaration form for the bidder to list responsible persons, such as members of management or supervisory bodies, in accordance with Article 46(1) of the Public Procurement Law.

8 priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl Tarybos Reglamente (ES) 2022576 nustatytų sąly...DOC
8 priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl Tarybos Reg...

This document contains a supplier's declaration form for both legal and natural persons, affirming compliance with Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 regarding restrictions related to Russia, ensuring the bidder is not influenced by or connected to Russian entities.

9 priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl Nacionalinio saugumo reikalavimų atitiktiesDOC
9 priedas Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl Nacionalini...

This document contains a declaration form for suppliers to confirm their compliance with national security requirements for a tender.

BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI + 1 priedas (pasiūlymo forma)DOC
BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI + 1 priedas (pasiūlymo...

This document contains the conditions for an open tender organized by Kauno Klinikos for the procurement of various types of ultrasound machines (echoscopes), detailing general provisions, the procurement object, and supplier qualification requirements.

3 priedas Bendrosios Prekių viešojo pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties sąlygosPDF
3 priedas Bendrosios Prekių viešojo pirkimo-p...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase-sale agreement, defining key concepts, contract interpretation rules, document hierarchy, and the subject of the contract.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.5 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6576072.pdf

Summary generation failed

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) request form, likely in both XML and PDF formats, for bidders to declare compliance with tender requirements.

6 priedas KAINŲ LENTELĖXLS
6 priedas KAINŲ LENTELĖ.xls

This document contains a price table for various types of ultrasound scanners, requiring the bidder to specify their name, model, quantity, and prices both with and without VAT.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6576072_1.xml

This document contains an XML structure defining the submission requirements for a tender, specifying a mandatory file for the complete tender.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.4 KB

Summary generation failed

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates good legal compliance and basic completeness, but suffers from significant clarity and fairness issues due to missing evaluation criteria and sparse detailed requirements. Sustainability aspects are largely absent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, 2014/24/ES) and correctly assigns the CPV code. It references EU regulations (ESPD, Council Regulation 2022/576) and shows no disputes. The main issue is the missing reveal date, which prevents full assessment of the initial notice period.

Missing tender reveal date.
Clarity50/100

While the tender's subject ('Echoskopai') is clear, the AI-extracted requirements are extremely sparse, indicating a lack of detailed information readily available. Crucially, evaluation criteria are flagged as missing, which severely impacts bidders' understanding of how proposals will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria.
AI-extracted requirements are very sparse, lacking detail for eligibility, technical, and financial aspects.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and duration are well-specified. A good number of documents are attached. However, the completeness is hampered by the lack of detailed requirements and the absence of evaluation criteria in the provided summary.

AI-extracted requirements are incomplete, lacking specific details for various categories.
Evaluation criteria are not specified in the provided information.
Fairness60/100

Full document access and disclosed value contribute positively to fairness. The stated e-procurement capability is also good. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria is a major concern, as it compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive offers.

Missing evaluation criteria, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Sparse AI-extracted requirements make it difficult to assess potential tailoring.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies contract duration and is EU funded. While 'E-Procurement' is listed, the automated checks flag 'No e-submission', creating ambiguity. A document URL is not provided, and the contract start date is not explicitly known.

Ambiguity regarding electronic submission (E-Procurement vs. No e-submission).
Document URL not provided.
Data Consistency80/100

The tender data is largely consistent with no disputes or suspensions, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there's a contradiction regarding e-submission. The sparse AI-extracted requirements also point to gaps in populated fields.

Empty 'Liable Person' field.
Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated check result.
Sustainability30/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies higher standards, but explicitly lacks any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus according to the automated checks. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No social criteria included.

Strengths

Clear procedure type and CPV code.
All basic information (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, duration) is present.
Many supporting documents are attached and listed.
EU funded, indicating adherence to broader EU standards.
Value is disclosed and not classified.

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity and fairness.
AI-extracted requirements are extremely sparse, suggesting a lack of detail in the main tender information.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.
Ambiguity regarding electronic submission (E-Procurement vs. No e-submission).
Missing tender reveal date.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Ensure all mandatory requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) are comprehensively detailed and easily accessible within the tender documentation.
3. Clarify the exact method for electronic submission and provide a direct document URL if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline