Skip to main content
Tenders

Organization and service of three conferences

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00165934/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€617,288
Avg. Bids
0.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
11,194 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Organization and service of three conferences

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88b2-8ed7-7cae-056e-e50001aa9667.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice from the University of Zielona Góra for the organization and servicing of three conferences.

edytowalne zalaczniki.zipZIP
edytowalne zalaczniki.zip -- 5.1 MB

This document contains the specifications of the order for the organization and service of three conferences, detailing the subject of the order, participation conditions, and evaluation criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for organizing three conferences is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined process. However, the absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a reference number, CPV code, and a clear procedure. The presence of numerous attached documents suggests a structured approach. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' and the potentially short submission deadline could be points of concern regarding procedural fairness and regulatory adherence.

Missing reveal date
Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the AI-extracted requirements indicate that key areas like eligibility and technical capabilities are addressed. The availability of 15 documents, including detailed OPZ (Scope of Work) and SWZ (Tender Documentation) files, suggests a good level of detail. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant gap.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and deadline. A substantial number of documents are provided, covering various aspects of the tender. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated, impacting overall completeness.

Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of all documents and the clear structure of requirements suggest a fair process. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The disclosure of value is missing, which is a slight detractor.

Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, impacting practical execution planning.

No e-submission (contradictory)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The AI-extracted requirements align with the general description.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Comprehensive documentation provided
Utilizes e-procurement (indicated)
Well-defined CPV code and location

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline if deemed too short.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline