Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

32102 BUILDING RESEARCH (ENGINEERING SERVICES) KVS

Open
Deadline
1857 days left
May 05, 2031
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6436726
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 28, 2031

Submission Deadline

May 05, 2031

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Other
73
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The nature of the procurement object is described in Annex No. 3 (3.1 - 3.4) of the KVS documents. Specific
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks to establish a Qualification Assessment System (KVS) for engineering services. Success hinges on demonstrating robust technical capability and a clear understanding of the unspecified KVS appendix details. Bidders should focus on proactive engagement to clarify requirements and highlight specialized expertise to differentiate themselves in a potentially competitive landscape.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Engineering Excellence: Demonstrating a deep understanding and capability in delivering high-quality engineering services tailored to the specific needs outlined in the KVS.

Reliable Partner for Future Projects: Positioning the bidder as a trusted and capable partner for LTG Kompetencijų centras UAB's future engineering service procurements through the KVS.

Key Opportunities
Clarification of KVS Appendix No. 3 details
Leveraging the 'Derybos su išankstiniu kvietimu dalyvauti konkurse ir (arba) konkursas su derybomis' procurement type
Establishing a strong foundation for future contracts
Key Challenges
Lack of specific technical requirements and evaluation criteria

Proactively request clarification on KVS Appendix No. 3 and any associated evaluation criteria. If no clarification is provided, base the bid on a comprehensive understanding of typical engineering service requirements for infrastructure projects and highlight broad capabilities.

Potential for high competition due to the broad CPV code and lack of explicit exclusion/eligibility criteria

Focus on demonstrating superior technical expertise and a clear understanding of the (yet to be fully defined) procurement object. Highlight unique selling points and a commitment to quality and reliability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established engineering services firm with a proven track record in delivering complex projects within the specified CPV code (71300000). The ideal bidder possesses strong technical expertise in areas likely covered by KVS appendix No. 3 (e.g., geological, geodetic, structural, environmental) and has experience with public sector procurement processes in Lithuania (LT022 NUTS code).
Key Requirements
Capability to provide Engineering Services (CPV: 71300000)
Ability to meet the specific nature of the procurement object as described in KVS documents appendix No. 3 (3.1. - 3.4.)
Submission by the deadline of 2031-05-05 10:00:00
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in specific engineering disciplines relevant to LTG's infrastructure (e.g., railway engineering, civil engineering for transport infrastructure).
A clear and structured approach to quality assurance and project management.
Proven ability to adapt to evolving project requirements and deliver within defined timelines (even if not explicitly stated, this is a general expectation for engineering services).
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Thoroughly analyze KVS Appendix No. 3 once obtained. Showcase relevant past projects, technical expertise, and the qualifications of key personnel. If the appendix is unavailable, emphasize a broad range of engineering capabilities and a robust methodology for addressing diverse engineering challenges.

Understanding of Procurement Object

Prioritize obtaining and understanding KVS Appendix No. 3. If direct clarification is not possible, infer likely requirements based on the contracting authority (LTG - Lithuanian Railways) and the CPV code. Articulate how the bidder's services align with these inferred needs.

Submission Process

Adhere strictly to the submission deadline and format requirements. Utilize the provided CVP IS platform and consult the 'How to develop and submit a tender' presentation (if accessible) to ensure a flawless submission.

Recommendations5
Obtain and Analyze KVS Appendix No. 3
CriticalHigh effort

Immediately seek to obtain KVS Appendix No. 3 (3.1. - 3.4.) which details the specific nature of the procurement object. This document is paramount for understanding the technical requirements and tailoring the bid effectively.

Enables accurate bid development and demonstration of compliance, directly impacting the win probability.
Proactive Clarification and Engagement
CriticalMed effort

Given the 'Negotiations' procurement type and unspecified evaluation criteria, actively engage with LTG Kompetencijų centras UAB to seek clarification on technical requirements, expected outcomes, and evaluation methodology. This can be done through formal tender queries.

Reduces ambiguity, allows for a more targeted bid, and demonstrates proactive engagement, potentially influencing evaluation.
Highlight Specialized Engineering Expertise
HighMed effort

Even without explicit evaluation criteria, differentiate by showcasing deep expertise in specific engineering disciplines relevant to LTG's operations (e.g., railway infrastructure, civil engineering, structural integrity, environmental impact assessments for transport projects). Provide concrete examples of successful projects.

Sets the bidder apart from generalist engineering firms and positions them as a specialist.
Ensure Flawless Submission
CriticalLow effort

Strictly adhere to the submission deadline of 2031-05-05 10:00:00. Familiarize with the CVP IS platform and the 'How to develop and submit a tender' presentation to avoid any technical submission errors.

Prevents disqualification due to procedural errors.
Develop a Robust Technical Proposal Framework
HighMed effort

If KVS Appendix No. 3 remains elusive, develop a comprehensive technical proposal that covers a wide spectrum of potential engineering service needs relevant to LTG, demonstrating adaptability and a strong problem-solving approach. Include methodologies for quality assurance, risk management, and project execution.

Mitigates the risk of not meeting specific, unstated requirements by showcasing broad competence.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a specialist engineering firm with a deep understanding of infrastructure projects, particularly those related to rail, to stand out from general engineering service providers.
Emphasize a proactive and collaborative approach, highlighting the willingness to engage in dialogue during the negotiation phase to ensure alignment with LTG's specific needs.
Showcase a strong track record of successful project delivery, focusing on quality, reliability, and adherence to standards, even if specific evaluation criteria are not yet defined.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Proposals must be submitted by 2031-05-05 10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided in the analyzed information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are provided in the analyzed information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be capable of providing Engineering Services.
--The bidder must be able to meet the specific nature of the procurement object as described in KVS documents appendix No. 3 (3.1. - 3.4.). (Details are not provided in the analyzed information).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are provided in the analyzed information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

22 documents available with AI summaries

Priedas_Nr._V._Bendra_nac._saugumo_deklaracija_Annex_No_V._General_declaration_o...DOC
Priedas_Nr._V._Bendra_nac._saugumo_deklaracij... -- 29.5 KB

This document is a general declaration of national security, likely required to confirm a bidder's compliance with security standards for the tender.

0. Del_priesisku_valstybiu_nefinansavimo_Regarding_the_non-financing_hostile_sta...DOC
0. Del_priesisku_valstybiu_nefinansavimo_Rega... -- 32.7 KB

This document likely requires bidders to declare their non-involvement in financing or supporting hostile states, a mandatory compliance statement for tender submission.

Kvietimas teikti paraiškas_Invitation to submit ApplicationsDOC
0. KVS1_Kvietimas tiekėjams teikti Pirmines p...

This document is an invitation for suppliers to submit applications for inclusion in a Qualification Assessment System (KVS) for future engineering services procurements.

0. KVS1_Specialiosios_sąlygos_(SPS)_QS1_Special_conditions_(SPC).docxDOC
0. KVS1_Specialiosios_sąlygos_(SPS)_QS1_Speci... -- 63.3 KB

This document outlines the specific conditions and requirements applicable to the tender for engineering services.

1. Priedas Nr.1_KVS1_Bendrosios_sąlygos_(BPS)_Annex No.1_QS1_General_conditions_...DOC
1. Priedas Nr.1_KVS1_Bendrosios_sąlygos_(BPS)... -- 247.1 KB

This document details the general conditions and terms that apply to the tender for construction research (engineering services).

2. Priedas Nr.2_Paraiškos_forma_Annex No.2_Application_form.docxDOC
2. Priedas Nr.2_Paraiškos_forma_Annex No.2_Ap... -- 63.4 KB

This document is an application form required for submitting your tender proposal for engineering services.

3. Priedas Nr.3.1_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (KVS kategorija Nr. I)_Annex 3.1. De...DOC
3. Priedas Nr.3.1_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (... -- 47.9 KB

This document details the technical specifications and scope of the engineering services required for the tender.

3. Priedas Nr.3.2_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (KVS kategorija Nr. II)_Annex 3.2. D...DOC
3. Priedas Nr.3.2_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (... -- 48.7 KB

This document details the specific technical requirements and scope of the engineering services being procured, outlining the nature of the procurement object.

3. Priedas Nr.3.3_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (KVS kategorija Nr. III)_Annex 3.3. ...DOC
3. Priedas Nr.3.3_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (... -- 45.8 KB

This document details the specific requirements and scope for the engineering services being procured under the tender, helping companies understand the object of the bid.

3. Priedas Nr.3.4_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (KVS kategorija Nr. IV)_Annex 3.4. D...DOC
3. Priedas Nr.3.4_Pirkimo objekto aprašymas (... -- 47.3 KB

This document details the specific requirements and nature of the engineering services being procured, serving as a comprehensive description of the tender's object.

Priedas Nr. I.(A) Pašalinimo pagrindai_Annex No I(A). Grounds for exlusion_(KVS)...DOC
Priedas Nr. I.(A) Pašalinimo pagrindai_Annex ... -- 56.0 KB

This document outlines the specific reasons or conditions under which a company may be excluded from participating in the tender process.

Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams (III kategorija)_Annex I.(B) Other...DOC
Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams... -- 57.8 KB

This document outlines additional qualification requirements for suppliers in category III, which are essential for tender submission.

Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams (II kategorija)_Annex I.(B) Other ...DOC
Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams... -- 54.3 KB

This document outlines additional requirements for suppliers, specifically for Qualification System category No. II, which bidders must address to qualify for the tender.

Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekėjams (I kategorija)_Annex I.(B) Other R...DOC
Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekėjams... -- 64.0 KB

This document details the additional eligibility and qualification criteria that suppliers must meet to participate in the tender for engineering services.

Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams (IV kategorija)_Annex I.(B) Other ...DOC
Priedas Nr. I.(B) Kiti reikalavimai tiekejams... -- 55.6 KB

This document outlines additional qualification and eligibility criteria that suppliers must meet to participate in the tender for engineering services.

Priedas_Nr._III._Subtiekėjo_ūkio_subjekto_deklaracija_Annex_No_III_Declaration_o...DOC
Priedas_Nr._III._Subtiekėjo_ūkio_subjekto_dek... -- 34.5 KB

This document is a required declaration for sub-suppliers to confirm their economic entity status, essential for companies planning to use sub-contractors in the tender.

Priedas_Nr._VII._Atstovaujančių_asmenų_sąrašas_Annex_No_VII._List_of_representat...DOC
Priedas_Nr._VII._Atstovaujančių_asmenų_sąraša... -- 48.3 KB

This document is a template or form for listing authorized representatives of the bidding company, crucial for legal authorization and tender submission.

Priedas_Nr._XII._Laidavimo sutarties formos pavyzdys_Annex No. XII. Sample form ...DOC
Priedas_Nr._XII._Laidavimo sutarties formos p... -- 41.0 KB

This document provides a sample form for an Assurance Agreement, outlining the structure and content of a guarantee or commitment that may be required for the tender.

Priedas_Nr._X._Tiekėjo_deklaracija_Annex_No._X._Supplier's_declaration.docxDOC
Priedas_Nr._X._Tiekėjo_deklaracija_Annex_No._... -- 57.3 KB

This document is a supplier's declaration, likely requiring bidders to confirm their compliance with various tender requirements and eligibility criteria.

NoticePDF
Notice_6436726.pdf

This notice describes a Qualification Evaluation System for engineering services, inviting suppliers to apply for pre-qualification in categories such as geological, geodetic, structural expertise, and environmental research to be eligible for future specific procurements.

4. Priedas Nr.4_Klausimų atsakymų forma_suvestinė_Annex No.4_Question and answer...XLS
4. Priedas Nr.4_Klausimų atsakymų forma_suves... -- 78.8 KB

This document provides a summary of questions and answers related to the tender, offering clarifications and additional information for bidders.

Priedas_Nr._XI._Atitikimas Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos reikalavimams_Annex XI. Compli...XLS
Priedas_Nr._XI._Atitikimas Tiekėjų kvalifikac... -- 27.7 KB

This document is required for bidders to demonstrate compliance with the contracting authority's qualification requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Qualification Evaluation System (KVS) for engineering services, demonstrating good documentation and compliance with EU directives, but lacks transparency regarding estimated value and explicit sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type as a Qualification System under Directive 2014/25/EU, and CPV codes are correctly assigned. The submission deadline, while very long, is appropriate for a KVS. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced in documents, indicating compliance with legal requirements. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Estimated value is not disclosed, which is a transparency concern, even for a KVS.
Clarity80/100

The tender's nature as a Qualification System is clarified by the 'Notice' document. While the initial description is brief, it refers to numerous detailed appendices (25 documents total) that likely contain comprehensive technical and qualification requirements. The presence of a 'How to submit a tender' guide enhances clarity for bidders.

The high-level AI summary of requirements (eligibility, exclusion, financial, evaluation criteria) is very general, potentially leading to initial confusion, though detailed documents are available.
Completeness70/100

Basic information, CPV codes, and location are fully provided. A large number of detailed documents are attached, covering various aspects of the qualification process. Requirements for the procurement object and supplier qualification are referenced in these documents.

The estimated value of the KVS or the total value of contracts expected to be awarded through it is not disclosed.
The explicit duration of the Qualification System itself is not clearly stated in the summary.
Fairness70/100

Full document access and e-procurement capabilities ensure equal access for all potential bidders. The very long submission deadline (until 2031) provides ample time for preparation. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, with multiple categories for suppliers.

The non-disclosure of the estimated value reduces transparency and makes it difficult for bidders to assess the potential scale of future opportunities, impacting fairness.
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported and guidance is provided, which is highly practical. The tender is EU funded, providing clarity on financing. While specific contract start dates are not applicable for a KVS, the system's operational aspects seem well-supported.

The explicit duration of the Qualification System itself is not clearly stated in the summary, which could be a minor practical detail for long-term planning.
Data Consistency80/100

Key fields are generally populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical for a Qualification System. The procedure type is clearly defined, despite a minor inconsistency in the 'Procedure' field being 'None'.

The 'Procedure' field stating 'None' is slightly inconsistent with the 'Type' field specifying a detailed procedure under Directive 2014/25/ES.
Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain higher standards. However, there is no explicit mention of specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided summary or AI-extracted information.

Lack of explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear definition of Qualification System under EU Directive.
Comprehensive documentation with 25 detailed documents.
E-Procurement enabled with submission guidance.
EU Funded, suggesting higher standards.
No reported disputes or suspensions.

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed, impacting transparency.
High-level summary lacks specific details on eligibility and evaluation criteria.
Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.
Explicit duration of the Qualification System is not stated in the summary.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated total value or scope of contracts expected through the KVS to enhance transparency.
2. Provide a concise, high-level summary of key qualification and evaluation criteria for easier initial assessment by bidders.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria into the KVS or subsequent specific procurements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline