Skip to main content
Tenders

Precipitation Network and Rural Nitrogen Dioxide Network UKEAP- NO2 Net and Precip-Net

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
015335-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

November 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
52
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Precip Net: Precip-Net sites collect rainwater using standard bulk rainwater collectors on a fortnightly basis to measure the bulk deposition of both acidifying and eutrophying chemical species at 48 sites. This includes calcium, chloride, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphate, nitrate, ammonium, sulphate, non-marine sulphate, acidity, conductivity, pH and total rainfall levels. At the two UK EMEP Supersites, daily wet only collectors are operated and samples analysed for the same ions as the bulk samplers with the addition of fluoride. With the long term time series from this network, it is possible to do trend analysis and modelling of chemical deposition via rainfall to UK ecosystems. Precip-Net is measured via bottle collectors mounted on a pole. The samples are collected fortnightly by the Local Site Operators (LSOs), returned, processed and sent for analysis. The bottle collector has a funnel with a polypropylene mesh filter at the base to prevent coarse material entering the collection chamber. Bird deterrents are also located on the top of the funnels to try to minimise contamination from bird droppings. At Auchencorth Moss and Chilbolton (The two EMEP sites) daily wet only collections are also made. This is via a wet only sampler and is used towards meeting the UK’s EMEP commitments. Ion analysis of the daily samples is undertaken, including: Na, NH4-N, K, Mg, Ca, Cl, NO3-N, SO4-S, PO4-P. In the daily samples fluoride (F-) is measured additionally. NO2 Net NO2-Net sites are a subset of the Precip-Net sites and are used to provide a rural background for the UK modelling of NO2 via the Defra Modelling Ambient Air Quality contract for annual compliance mapping at 26 sites. This supplements information delivered on a separate EA network, the Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN). Samples are taken using diffusion tubes. Three diffusion tubes with stainless steel grids mounted in low density polyethylene caps are used to collect the samples. The stainless steel grids are impregnated with an absorbent chemical (triethanolamine and acetone) which captures the NO2 as the gas diffuses through the tube. The tubes are left in situ for 4 weeks then analysed. Following a two-year intercomparison study during 2022 and 2023 comparing the performance of tubes with and without wind protection caps, the use of the tubes without the wind protection caps were discontinued and only those tubes with wind protection caps are now employed in the network. These tubes, provided by Gradko, are like those used in the UK Urban NO2 Network (UUNN Network). The wind protection caps help maintain the diffusion path length and hence reduces the positive sampling bias.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (14)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submission of bid by the deadline: 2026-03-31T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per general public procurement regulations (e.g., bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions). Specific grounds are not detailed in the provided tender description.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally eligible to participate in public procurement processes in the relevant jurisdiction. Specific eligibility criteria are not detailed in the provided tender description.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS14
--Ability to collect rainwater samples fortnightly at 48 designated sites.
--Capability to measure and analyze specific chemical species in rainwater samples: calcium, chloride, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphate, nitrate, ammonium, sulphate, non-marine sulphate, acidity, conductivity, pH, and total rainfall levels.
--Ability to operate daily wet-only collectors at the two UK EMEP Supersites (Auchencorth Moss and Chilbolton).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Ability to deliver the required services within an estimated contract value of 2,400,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

52
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a detailed technical description of environmental monitoring services but suffers from critical deficiencies in transparency and fairness, notably the absence of evaluation criteria and potentially tailored technical requirements. The lack of access to full tender documents and a defined procedure type further undermine its quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The absence of a defined procedure type and a missing reveal date are significant legal oversights. While CPV codes are present and mandatory exclusion grounds are acknowledged, these omissions hinder full compliance assessment.

Missing procedure type
Missing reveal date
Clarity60/100

The technical description of the required services is exceptionally detailed and clear. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness50/100

While basic information, deadlines, and a detailed service description are provided, the lack of access to the actual tender documents (despite 4 being listed), the undefined procedure type, and the absence of evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in completeness.

No document content available
Missing procedure type
Fairness25/100

The explicit mention of 'Gradko tubes' and mandatory use of tubes 'similar to Gradko tubes' strongly suggests tailored requirements, severely limiting competition. The absence of evaluation criteria, lack of full document access, and no e-submission further compromise transparency and equal opportunity.

Requirements potentially tailored to a specific company/product (Gradko tubes)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality55/100

The lack of electronic submission options and the inability to access full tender documents directly (no URL provided, content not available) create practical hurdles for potential bidders. Key dates and values are present, but these operational deficiencies reduce practicality.

No e-submission
No document URL provided / No document content available
Data Consistency75/100

Most key data fields are consistent and logical, particularly regarding dates and financial information. However, the absence of a defined 'Type' and 'Procedure' for the tender, along with an empty 'Liable Person' field and missing reveal date, indicate minor data gaps and inconsistencies.

Procedure type is 'None'
Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability20/100

Despite the environmental nature of the services, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement principles, social considerations, or an innovation focus within the procurement process itself. This represents a missed opportunity.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Detailed and clear technical description of services
Specific CPV code and NUTS code provided
Clear financial value, duration, and contract start date
No disputes or suspensions reported
Requirements for mandatory exclusion grounds are acknowledged

Concerns

Absence of a defined procedure type and missing reveal date
Critical lack of specified evaluation criteria
No access to full tender document content
Technical requirements potentially tailored to a specific company/product (Gradko tubes)
Lack of electronic submission option

Recommendations

1. Publish the full tender documents, including a clearly defined procedure type and all evaluation criteria.
2. Review technical specifications to ensure they are generic and promote fair competition, avoiding references to specific brands or products unless justified by interoperability or proprietary reasons.
3. Implement electronic submission for improved accessibility and efficiency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline