Skip to main content
Tenders

Forest regeneration in forest properties owned by Gulbene Municipality

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168703
Value
€16,000
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€16,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€188,684
Avg. Bids
7.9
Competition
High
SME Winners
100%
7,851 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Forest regeneration in forest properties owned by Gulbene Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission procedures are outlined in the 'Nolikums' document.
--Other necessary documents are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
--The submission deadline is 2026-04-03T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidder requirements are outlined in the 'Nolikums' document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical specifications are outlined in the 'Nolikums' document.
--Requirements for a technical proposal are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Requirements for a financial proposal are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168703_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319151710.pdf -- 95.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender related to forest restoration in Gulbene municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

Līguma projektsDOC
6_pielikums_Liguma_projekts.docx -- 43.3 KB

This document is a draft contract for forest restoration services in Gulbene municipality, outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and contract termination conditions.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_GNP_2026_21.doc -- 170.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement tender for forest restoration services in Gulbene municipality, outlining bidder requirements, submission procedures, and technical specifications.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning forest regeneration in Gulbene municipality's forest properties, with a submission deadline of April 3, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for forest restoration in Gulbene municipality is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and requirements are documented across several attached files. While specific criteria are mentioned as being in documents, the explicit statement of evaluation criteria is missing, which slightly impacts clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. Four tender documents are provided, covering requirements and contract drafts. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and potential access restrictions to documents could be seen as a completeness issue for bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, uses e-procurement, and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable. The main concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which, if true, significantly impacts fairness by limiting full document access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests that the submission process might not be fully electronic, which reduces practicality. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description and documented requirements
E-procurement characteristic
Reasonable estimated value and contract duration
CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
No explicit evaluation criteria specified
Potential lack of full e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access policies and ensure full accessibility for all potential bidders.
2. Explicitly state evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
3. Confirm and detail the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline