T138 Supply of Metered Electricity

This tender for metered electricity supply is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its overall completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is competitive, and the value is disclosed. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline relative to the contract start date could be tighter.

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce the completeness of the tender package.

The tender is structured as a competitive flexible procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements are listed as general categories, which suggests a fair approach, and there are no immediate indications of tailoring to specific companies. E-submission is not explicitly mentioned as a requirement.

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document content reduce the practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date is the same as the submission deadline, which is unusual and may indicate a data entry error or a very tight turnaround.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.