Skip to main content
Tenders

Connect to Work Supported Employment Quality Framework (SEQF)

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019434-2026
Value
£2,725,850
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,725,850
Duration
11 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Surrey County Council (the Council) is seeking tenders from suitably qualified suppliers for Connect to Work Supported Employment Quality Framework (SEQF). Connect to Work is a voluntary programme designed to support those who are economically inactive into work. It takes a supported employment approach that focuses on placing participants into work at the earliest opportunity and providing ongoing support to help them succeed. Unlike some other models that may emphasise extensive pre-employment training and intervention, Connect to Work integrates job-seeking and employment support, ensuring that participants can start working quickly while receiving the necessary assistance to overcome barriers. The main aim of this procurement is to appoint one Supplier to deliver a service to 600 participants between 2026/27 and 2029/30 using the SEQF model and approach.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements mentioned in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Suitably qualified suppliers
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Ability to deliver a supported employment approach
--Ability to support 600 participants between 2026/27 and 2029/30
--Experience with the SEQF model and approach
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a supported employment quality framework presents a clear objective and scope but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and readily accessible documentation, impacting a comprehensive quality assessment.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and reasonable duration. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for documents and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria represent minor procedural gaps. The deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, and there is no indication of disputes or regulatory issues.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the 'Connect to Work' program and its supported employment approach is clear and well-articulated. The main aim and target participant numbers are specified. However, the lack of detailed documentation, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, limits the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the absence of accessible tender documents with content and the lack of specific financial or submission requirements reduce the completeness of the provided information.

No document content available
Missing specific financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, with a disclosed value and objective criteria implied by the eligibility and technical capability requirements. The procedure is open, suggesting broad access. The primary concern is the lack of easily accessible full documentation, which could indirectly affect fairness by limiting a bidder's ability to fully understand the scope and requirements without further effort.

No document content available
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission as the primary method, nor does it provide a direct URL to documents. The absence of financing information is also a practical drawback.

No e-submission mentioned
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

All key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. The contract start date is after the submission deadline, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The duration aligns with the stated program timeframe.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are standard elements for sustainability considerations in modern tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear program description and objective
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for broad participation
Key dates (deadline, start) are provided

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender documents with content
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
No explicit mention of e-submission or document URL
Limited consideration for sustainability aspects

Recommendations

1. Provide full access to all tender documents with clear summaries or content.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Incorporate sustainability considerations and explicitly mention them in the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline