Modernization of the premises of the Municipal Office in Żabno

This tender for the modernization of the Municipal Office in Żabno is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, but the absence of a reveal date is noted. No disputes are reported.

The description of works is detailed and broken down into logical categories (preparatory, general construction, sanitary). Technical requirements are clearly outlined, providing a good understanding of the expected scope. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Key information such as the title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are available, the lack of financial details impacts overall completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The requirements are generally objective and related to the scope of works. The lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as it limits full transparency for potential bidders.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the AI analysis flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The contract start date and financing information are not provided, reducing practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. No suspension or disputes are indicated. Dates are logically presented, with the submission deadline being in the future. The 'active' status is consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.