Skip to main content
Tenders

Trade Waste Collection Service RCT CBC

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
025794-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

November 01, 2026

Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Rhondda Cynon Taf are investigating a potential replacement solution to the existing Trade Recycling and Trade Food collections. TUPE does not apply. Full details are provided in the information memorandum

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Full details are provided in the information memorandum
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--TUPE does not apply.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[requirement 1]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[requirement 1]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[requirement 1]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Trade Waste Collection Service is in the planning stage, with a clear description and estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, relying heavily on an external memorandum.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The procedure type is not explicitly stated, which is a minor omission.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the fact that TUPE does not apply is explicitly stated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the reliance on an external memorandum for full details reduce overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Full details provided in the information memorandum
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date. However, the lack of content for the attached documents and the reliance on an external memorandum for crucial details indicate a lack of completeness within the tender notice itself.

Documents with content/summaries: 0
Full details provided in the information memorandum
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a specified deadline. The criteria for eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements are mentioned as placeholders, suggesting a standard approach. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be a concern for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the URL for documents is not provided, making it less practical for potential bidders to access all necessary information easily.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The status 'planning' is consistent with the information presented.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Reliance on external 'information memorandum' for full details
Lack of content in attached documents
No explicit mention of e-submission or document URLs

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria within the tender notice.
2. Include summaries or content for all attached documents.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct document access links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline