Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of provincial road No. 296 in sections (61+600-62+200, 63+600 – 64+900, 66+700 – 67+300). CPV 45000000-7.

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00149897/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Dolnośląskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Dolnośląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of provincial road No. 296 in sections (61+600-62+200, 63+600 – 64+900, 66+700 – 67+300). CPV 45000000-7.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7f5d-c32f-e3c1-056e-e50001ac6cc2.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the renovation of sections of provincial road No. 296, with the contract awarded solely based on price.

SZCZEGÓŁOWE SPECYFIKACJE TECHNICZNE.pdfPDF
SZCZEGÓŁOWE SPECYFIKACJE TECHNICZNE.pdf

This document contains detailed technical specifications for road and bridge works, outlining general requirements for execution and acceptance of construction activities.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and available documents. However, the absence of an estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is not fully assessable without contract duration. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the road renovation is specific, and technical specifications are provided. The CPV code is clear. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed beyond price.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. Six tender documents are available, with technical specifications detailed. The estimated value and contract duration are missing, which are significant omissions.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible. The lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though the award is stated to be solely based on price, which is an objective criterion.

Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information, along with the lack of explicit e-submission details (though e-procurement is mentioned), reduces practicality.

No e-submission (implied, though e-procurement is listed)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is consistent. No disputes or suspensions are reported. Dates are logical within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
E-procurement utilized
All required documents available
Specific road sections identified for renovation

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations
Missing contract duration

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria beyond just price.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline