Skip to main content
Tenders

Development and approval of the description of the out-of-home care quality monitoring system

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
164787
Value
€228,347
Location
Latvia
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€228,347
Duration
24 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,411
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,077 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development and approval of the description of the out-of-home care quality monitoring system
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submission deadline: March 31, 2026, 09:00.
--Tender procedure for the development and approval of an out-of-family care quality supervision system.
--Requirements include selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Development and approval of a description for an out-of-family care quality monitoring system.
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164787_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260224052214.pdf -- 94.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the development and approval of an out-of-family care quality monitoring system, including selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.

NolikumsDOC
20260220_nolikums_LRLM_2026_10_ESF.docx -- 239.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development and approval of an out-of-family care quality supervision system, funded by the European Social Fund Plus and state budget.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for a tender concerning the development and approval of a description for an out-of-family care quality monitoring system, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for developing a quality monitoring system description is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has potential issues with document access, impacting overall transparency and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline is reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the organization and type of tender.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the core requirements are outlined in the provided documents. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. The tender specifies three attached documents, suggesting a good level of completeness. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are not explicitly provided in the summaries, which could be a point of concern for potential bidders.

AI-extracted requirements suggest missing specific details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for selection are mentioned as being in Document 3, but their specific nature is not detailed in the summary. The primary concern for fairness is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could limit full document access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue directly impacts practicality, as bidders may not be able to fully access necessary information. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while financing is mentioned (EU and state budget), detailed financing information is not elaborated upon.

Restricted document access
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of specific focus in these areas.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Specified CPV code and NUTS code
E-Procurement enabled
Reasonable submission deadline and tender validity
EU funded

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability and innovation focus
Limited detail on financial and eligibility requirements in summaries

Recommendations

1. Clarify and publish specific evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability and innovation objectives into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline