Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of reagents for the diagnosis of rare infectious diseases

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00171932/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of reagents for the diagnosis of rare infectious diseases

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a95-087b-786c-5fad-950001bdd8d0.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of reagents for the diagnosis of rare infectious diseases by the Healthcare Center in Ropczyce, Poland.

10_ROZDZIA¥ IV - Zaêacznik do umowy - Umowa powierzenia danych.docxDOC
10_ROZDZIA¥ IV - Zaêacznik do umowy - Umowa p... -- 24.0 KB

No content extracted

1_Spis_treÿci.docxDOC
1_Spis_treÿci.docx -- 55.3 KB

No content extracted

2_ROZDZIA¥ I - IDW.docxDOC
2_ROZDZIA¥ I - IDW.docx -- 141.0 KB

No content extracted

3_ROZDZIA¥ I - PODSTAWOWE INFORMACJE DOTYCZñCE POST¿POWANIA.docxDOC
3_ROZDZIA¥ I - PODSTAWOWE INFORMACJE DOTYCZñC... -- 75.8 KB

No content extracted

4_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 1 do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o wykluczeniu.docDOC
4_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 1 do oferty - Où... -- 93.5 KB

No content extracted

5_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 1A do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o wykluczeniu_zobowiÑza...DOC
5_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 1A do oferty - O... -- 90.0 KB

No content extracted

6_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 2 do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE Konsorcjum.docDOC
6_ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK nr 2 do oferty - Où... -- 82.5 KB

No content extracted

7 ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 3 do oferty - Formularz cenowy.docxDOC
7 ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 3 do oferty - Fo... -- 23.2 KB

No content extracted

8_ROZDZIA¥ III - Opis_Przedmiotu_Zamówienia.docxDOC
8_ROZDZIA¥ III - Opis_Przedmiotu_Zamówienia.d... -- 15.4 KB

No content extracted

9_ROZDZIA¥ IV - PPU.docxDOC
9_ROZDZIA¥ IV - PPU.docx -- 37.2 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for laboratory reagents is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a specified CPV code. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and the short submission deadline are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization details, and a CPV code. The procedure type is indicated, and the status is active. However, the absence of a reveal date for the submission deadline and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could pose challenges for legal compliance and transparency.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement. The CPV code is provided, and the AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the lack of specific details within the document summaries (e.g., 'No content extracted') hinders a full assessment of clarity.

Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, organization, and submission deadline is present. The CPV code and location are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the duration of the contract is missing, impacting the overall completeness of the tender documentation.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting a modern and accessible process. The availability of 11 tender documents indicates a comprehensive set of information. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could affect fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive indicator for practical submission. However, the AI-extracted issues mention 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The absence of a contract start date and financing information also reduces practicality.

No e-submission (contradictory to E-Procurement characteristic)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the status is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender notice.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specified CPV code
E-Procurement characteristic
Multiple tender documents available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for adequate preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline