Skip to main content
Tenders

NELFT Voluntary & Community Sector (VCS) Peer Worker Provision

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016680-2026
Value
£664,000
Location
Outer London - East and North East, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£664,000
Duration
13 months
Location
Outer London - East and North East
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This service specification provides the overarching details and requirements to deliver the North East London NHS Foundation Trust Voluntary & Community Sector (VCS) Peer Support Worker Provision. It provides the necessary background information, service details and requirements to enable providers to effectively plan, deliver and manage the services

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear description of service requirements for VCS Peer Worker Provision with a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The service specification provides a good overview of requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed document content makes it less clear how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, organization, and value is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of accessible document content and missing evaluation criteria reduces overall completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. Requirements are not explicitly tailored to specific companies. The use of an open procedure promotes fairness. However, the lack of accessible document content could be a barrier.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is not detailed. The absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of accessible document content may hinder practical application.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Value and deadline disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No explicit mention of e-submission
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Make tender documents fully accessible with content summaries.
3. Clarify e-submission process and consider incorporating sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline