Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Expansion of Dworcowa Street in Goleszów

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00162757/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Expansion of Dworcowa Street in Goleszów

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the expansion of Dworcowa Street in Goleszów presents a moderate opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/financial requirements suggests a focus on compliance and basic capability. Winning will depend on demonstrating robust project management, timely delivery of essential permits, and a competitive price.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and timely delivery of essential permits and construction works for Goleszów's infrastructure development.

Cost-effective and efficient execution of road expansion, ensuring value for the contracting authority.

Key Opportunities
Potential for a less competitive bid due to the absence of detailed technical and financial requirements, allowing for a focus on core competencies.
Opportunity to differentiate through proactive permit acquisition and a clear, efficient project execution plan, even without explicit evaluation criteria.
The unspecified nature of evaluation criteria may allow for a more flexible pricing strategy, provided it remains competitive.
Key Challenges
Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring metrics.

Focus on meeting all mandatory requirements flawlessly and present a clear, concise, and well-structured bid that demonstrates competence and value. Assume price will be a significant factor.

The absence of estimated value and duration creates uncertainty in resource allocation and pricing.

Conduct thorough market research on similar road construction projects in Poland to establish a realistic cost baseline. Develop a flexible project plan that can adapt to potential scope adjustments.

The critical nature of obtaining permits means any delays or failures in this area will lead to disqualification.

Dedicate a specific team member to manage the permit acquisition process from the outset, with established communication channels with relevant authorities. Include contingency plans for potential permit delays.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A medium-sized construction company with a proven track record in municipal road construction projects, possessing strong local knowledge and established relationships with permitting authorities in the PL225 region. They should have a lean operational structure to offer competitive pricing and a proactive approach to permit acquisition.
Key Requirements
Obtaining legally required decisions and permits for the expansion and reconstruction of municipal road No. 609121 S – Dworcowa Street in Goleszów, including the decision on environmental conditions for the implementation of the undertaking (so-called environmental decision).
Obtaining a building permit.
Execution of construction works (ZRID decision) – if required.
Performance of construction works.
Performing the function of author's supervision during the period of construction works.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in navigating and securing permits for municipal road projects in the specific NUTS region (PL225).
A detailed and realistic project execution plan that clearly outlines the timeline for permit acquisition and construction phases.
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure, supported by a clear breakdown of costs.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor for a percentage of the workforce, prioritizing residents of Goleszów and the surrounding region, to foster community development and reduce travel impact.
Bid Focus Areas
Eligibility Requirements (Permits & Decisions)

Prioritize and dedicate resources to securing all mandatory permits (environmental, building, ZRID if applicable) well in advance of the submission deadline. Document the process and have evidence readily available.

Performance of Construction Works

Provide a clear and concise methodology for the execution of construction works, highlighting efficiency, quality control, and adherence to safety standards. Reference past successful projects of similar scale.

Author's Supervision

Clearly outline the proposed author's supervision team, their qualifications, and their experience in similar road construction projects. Emphasize their role in ensuring project quality and compliance.

PriceLikely High (assumed)

Develop a competitive pricing strategy based on thorough cost analysis and market benchmarks. Ensure the price is justifiable and reflects the scope of work and expected duration.

Recommendations6
Proactive Permit Acquisition Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Immediately initiate the process of obtaining all legally required decisions and permits, including the environmental decision and building permit. Establish direct communication with relevant authorities to understand timelines and potential challenges.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Assume Price is a Key Differentiator
HighHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume that price will be a significant, if not the primary, factor. Develop a highly competitive and cost-effective bid without compromising on quality or compliance.

Increases chances of winning in a potentially price-sensitive tender.
Demonstrate Local Expertise and Relationships
MediumMed effort

Highlight any experience or established relationships with local authorities or stakeholders in the Goleszów region (PL225). This can build confidence in the bidder's ability to navigate local complexities.

Builds trust and credibility with the contracting authority.
Develop a Detailed Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

Create a clear, concise, and realistic project execution plan that outlines the methodology for construction, timelines for key milestones (including permit acquisition), resource allocation, and quality control measures.

Demonstrates competence and preparedness.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

Include a commitment to employ local labor from Goleszów and the surrounding areas, specifying a target percentage. This aligns with broader public sector goals and can be a positive, albeit non-mandatory, addition.

Enhances the bid's appeal and demonstrates corporate social responsibility.
Contingency Planning for Permit Delays
CriticalMed effort

Develop a contingency plan for potential delays in obtaining permits. This should include alternative strategies or communication protocols to manage such situations and inform the contracting authority proactively.

Mitigates a critical risk and demonstrates foresight.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for Goleszów's road infrastructure needs, emphasizing a proven ability to deliver on time and within budget, especially concerning permit acquisition.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Obtaining legally required decisions and permits for the expansion and reconstruction of municipal road No. 609121 S – Dworcowa Street in Goleszów, including the decision on environmental conditions for the implementation of the undertaking (so-called environmental decision).
--Obtaining a building permit.
--Execution of construction works (ZRID decision) – if required.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85af-b5d5-99f0-056e-e500011b85d7.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the expansion of Dworcowa Street in Goleszów, Poland, covering design and construction works.

PFU_Dworcowa 2025.pdfPDF
PFU_Dworcowa 2025.pdf -- 644.8 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction in Goleszów is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard Polish public procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, and no disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance seems to be met.

Clarity80/100

The description of the road expansion project is clear, and the attached documents provide substantial detail on the scope of works, including permit acquisition and construction phases. Requirements are documented, though evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a clear description. The submission deadline and CPV code are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is not explicitly stated, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the disclosure of most necessary documents. The criteria for eligibility are objective. The lack of disclosed financial value is a minor concern, but no requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the absence of a direct URL for document submission and the lack of explicit financing information reduce its practicality. The contract start date is also not specified.

No e-submission URL provided
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the tender status is active. No suspensions or disputes are noted, and the dates are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While EU funding is not specified, the absence of these elements limits the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Use of e-procurement
Proper CPV code and reference number

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline