Skip to main content
Tenders

Building management system (BMS) maintenance and repair services for Bāriņu Street 3, Liepāja for 3 years

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167588
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€82,313
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Building management system (BMS) maintenance and repair services for Bāriņu Street 3, Liepāja for 3 years

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submission of technical proposals
--Submission of financial proposals
--Submission of European Single Procurement Document (ESPD)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Maintenance and repair services for a building management system (BMS)
--Services to be provided for 3 years
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167588_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324112914.pdf -- 100.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for maintenance and repair services of the building management system (BMS) for the State Security Agency over 3 years, detailing submission requirements for technical and financial proposals.

espdZIP
espd-request.zip -- 84.9 KB

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning the maintenance and repair services for a Building Management System (BMS) at Bāriņu iela 3, Liepāja.

NolikumsZIP
nolikums.zip -- 245.4 KB

This document contains an application form for a tender concerning the maintenance and repair services for a building management system (BMS) at Bāriņu iela 3, Liepāja.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning maintenance and repair services for a building management system in Liepāja, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 17, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for BMS maintenance and repair services in Liepāja is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open competition type and a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed financial value, which can impact legal compliance regarding transparency.

Value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the required documents (ESPD, technical/financial proposals, application form) are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness. The required documents are listed.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on technical capability and standard submission documents. The lack of disclosed value and potential for restricted document access (as flagged) could impact full fairness.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract duration. E-procurement is indicated. However, the specific mention of 'No e-submission' in the checks contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating a practical inconsistency. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender summary. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Specified organization and location
Open competition procedure
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential for restricted document access
Contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to ensure consistency with e-procurement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline