Skip to main content
Tenders

Community Ophthalmology Service on behalf of NHS NNICB

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025009-2026
Value
£4,618,360
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Budget
£4,618,360
Duration
60 months
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board are inviting suitably qualified and experienced providers to deliver the Community Ophthalmology Service via a Competitive Process under the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) regulations.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Providers must be suitably qualified and experienced.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Community Ophthalmology Services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on technical capabilities, financial requirements, and submission procedures, and the deadline may be tight.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported. The use of Provider Selection Regime (PSR) regulations is noted, which is a specific legal framework.

Submission deadline may be too short.
Clarity80/100

The title, organization, and basic description are clear. The core requirement for 'suitably qualified and experienced providers' is stated. However, specific technical, financial, and submission requirements are not detailed, impacting overall clarity.

No specific technical capability requirements provided.
No specific financial requirements provided.
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly reduce completeness.

No document content available.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria for eligibility are broadly stated. The use of e-procurement is mentioned. However, the lack of specific, objective criteria for evaluation could be a concern.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality65/100

E-procurement is indicated, which is positive. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of explicit e-submission instructions and financing information limits practicality.

No e-submission details provided.
No financing information provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value).
Open procedure and e-procurement indicated.
Contract duration and start date specified.
CPV code provided.

Concerns

Lack of specific technical, financial, and submission requirements.
Missing evaluation criteria.
No document content available for review.
Potentially short submission deadline.
Absence of sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline