Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of vegetable growing accessories

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
169000
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
10 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€24,627
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,503 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of vegetable growing accessories

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for vegetable growing accessories presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating superior product quality and reliability, coupled with competitive pricing, given the lack of specified evaluation criteria. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority to clarify requirements is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and High-Quality Vegetable Growing Solutions

Cost-Effective Procurement for Enhanced Yields

Partnership for Sustainable Horticultural Success

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through a strong proposal.
The short 10-month duration suggests a need for readily available stock and efficient delivery, which can be a differentiator.
The CPV code 03144000 (Vegetable seeds) implies a focus on specific types of growing accessories, allowing for specialized product offerings.
Key Challenges
Absence of defined evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy without understanding weighting.

Proactively engage with SIA 'Getliņi EKO' through clarification requests to understand their priorities and potential weighting for technical, price, and other factors. If no clarification is possible, assume a balanced approach with strong emphasis on price and product quality.

No explicit mention of Green or Social aspects means these cannot be primary differentiators, requiring focus on core requirements.

While not explicitly requested, subtly highlight any inherent sustainability in product materials or supplier operations as a secondary benefit, without over-emphasizing it.

Potential for a highly competitive market due to the general nature of the supplies and lack of specific innovation requirements.

Focus on demonstrating superior product quality, durability, and value for money. Highlight any unique selling points related to product performance or ease of use that directly benefit the grower.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a proven track record in providing high-quality, durable vegetable growing accessories, capable of offering competitive pricing and demonstrating a strong understanding of SIA 'Getliņi EKO's' operational needs. The ideal bidder will also have efficient logistics and a responsive customer service team.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Compliance
Eligibility Requirements Compliance
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Procurement Requirements (as outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable product quality and durability exceeding standard offerings.
Competitive pricing with clear value proposition.
Responsive and efficient supply chain and customer support.
Deep understanding of vegetable growing needs and challenges.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider including a commitment to using recycled or sustainable packaging materials for delivery, or a commitment to sourcing from local suppliers where feasible, as a subtle value-add.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer a highly competitive price that reflects value for money. Conduct thorough cost analysis and benchmark against market rates. Consider tiered pricing or volume discounts if applicable.

Product Quality and Suitability

Clearly articulate the quality, durability, and suitability of the proposed vegetable growing accessories. Provide detailed specifications, certifications, and evidence of performance. Highlight any features that enhance usability or yield.

Delivery and Logistics

Demonstrate a robust and efficient delivery plan, emphasizing timeliness and reliability, especially given the short contract duration. Highlight any experience with similar logistics challenges.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
CriticalHigh effort

This document is key to understanding the specific technical and functional requirements for the vegetable growing accessories. Ensure all specifications are met or exceeded.

Ensures bid compliance and technical merit.
Seek clarification on evaluation criteria
CriticalMed effort

Given the absence of specified criteria, proactively submit clarification requests to SIA 'Getliņi EKO' to understand their priorities (e.g., price vs. quality weighting). This is crucial for tailoring the bid effectively.

Enables optimized bid strategy and higher scoring potential.
Emphasize product quality and durability
HighMed effort

Since innovation and social/green aspects are not specified, focus on demonstrating superior product quality, longevity, and reliability. Provide evidence such as warranties, testimonials, or performance data.

Sets the bid apart from competitors focusing solely on price.
Develop a competitive pricing strategy
HighHigh effort

Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to offer a price that is both competitive and profitable. Consider the total cost of ownership for the contracting authority.

Directly influences the financial evaluation and overall attractiveness of the bid.
Prepare for potential ambiguity in requirements
MediumMed effort

If clarification is not fully satisfactory, make reasonable assumptions based on industry best practices and clearly state these assumptions in the bid submission. This demonstrates diligence and proactive problem-solving.

Reduces risk of disqualification due to misinterpretation.
Incorporate subtle sustainability messaging
LowLow effort

While not a requirement, briefly mention any sustainable aspects of your products or operations (e.g., eco-friendly materials, reduced waste in packaging) as a value-add, without making it a central theme.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, impression.
Competitive Positioning
Position your offering as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for SIA 'Getliņi EKO's' vegetable growing needs. Highlight your ability to meet and exceed their specific product requirements with superior quality and a strong value proposition, especially given the short contract duration.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169000_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324090837.pdf -- 95.3 KB

This document outlines the procurement requirements for the purchase of vegetable growing supplies, including selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_GEKO_03_02_audzēšanas_piederumi.docx -- 221.4 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure for the purchase of vegetable growing supplies, including submission requirements and bidder qualifications.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning the purchase of vegetable growing accessories, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for vegetable growing supplies is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks transparency regarding the estimated value and specific evaluation criteria, and document access is restricted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline is reasonable. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern in some jurisdictions.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the existence of required documents (requirements, regulations) is indicated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria within the provided summaries reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organization details. Three tender documents are listed, with two marked as required. The main deficiency is the undisclosed estimated value, which impacts completeness.

Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a significant concern regarding full document access for all potential bidders, potentially impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs. The contract duration is stated. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the 'No e-submission' flag (contradicting 'E-Procurement' characteristic) reduce practicality.

No e-submission
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
Reasonable submission deadline
E-procurement characteristic indicated
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Restricted document access
Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria in the tender documents.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline