Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Library Management System_26

Open
Deadline
22 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028721-2026
Value
£1,164,000
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,164,000
Duration
70 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Liverpool City Council requires a supplier for a Library Management System. The contract will be for five years, with options to extend by a further five years, commencing August 2026. Further information and submission details are available on Procontract.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Register on Procontract (Due North) to receive the opportunity.
--Download the full document suite from Procontract.
--Return submission via the "my opportunities" section on Procontract.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific requirements to be detailed in the full tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific requirements to be detailed in the full tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific requirements to be detailed in the full tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific requirements to be detailed in the full tender documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Library Management System is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are reported. The procedure appears compliant with general procurement regulations.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required system is clear, and the need for registration on the Procontract platform is well-communicated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the public notice reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the full document suite is not directly accessible, and key requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are deferred to the full documents, impacting immediate completeness.

Full document suite not directly accessible
Key requirements detailed only in full documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of an e-procurement platform (Procontract) is standard. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness. Access to full documentation requires registration, which is a common but not ideal practice for maximum accessibility.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission via Procontract, which is practical. A URL for further information is provided. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any immediate inconsistencies. No suspension or disputes are noted.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear basic information and estimated value
Open procedure with disclosed CPV code
Use of e-procurement platform
Logical timeline and contract details

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Full tender documents require registration and are not directly accessible
Lack of detail on sustainability aspects
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Include specific evaluation criteria in the public notice for better bidder preparation.
2. Provide a direct link or summary of key requirements from the full tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability considerations (e.g., green procurement, social value) into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline