Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login22 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No processed documents available for this tender.
Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.
This tender for a four-year framework agreement for Civil & Structural Engineering services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.
The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The absence of specified disputes or known legal issues contributes positively. However, the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond the CDM regulations and the absence of a reveal date for documents are minor drawbacks.
The description of services, including the potential for Principal Designer roles and the types of projects covered, is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-documented. The conditions for subsidiary and external organizations to call off services are also outlined. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specific submission requirements and the absence of content for the attached documents, making it difficult for bidders to fully understand the submission process and expectations.
The tender demonstrates fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a restricted procedure which, when well-managed, can lead to focused competition. The eligibility criteria are objective and based on professional qualifications and experience. The mention of equivalent organizations for international practices enhances fairness. The use of e-procurement is also a positive indicator.
The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of a document URL for accessing full tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements hinder practicality. While the contract start date is implied by the submission deadline, explicit mention would be beneficial. Financing information is not detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated logically. The dates provided are consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code and NUTS code are also present and appropriate.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score in this category.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required