Skip to main content
Tenders

4 year Framework Agreement for the provision of Civil & Structural Engineering services for new build housing

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
017590-2026
Value
£30,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Budget
£30,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Link is seeking to enter into a four-year Framework Agreement with a maximum of six suitably qualified Civil & Structural Engineering Practices for the provision of engineering services. The services may also include the provision of Principal Designer under the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 where the practice can demonstrate it has the relevant experience to provide this role. We would expect the principals within the practice to be members of the Institution of Structural Engineers and Institution of Civil Engineers and for the practice to be a member of the SER Scheme and we would also consider membership of ACE to be acceptable (or their equivalent organisations within the country that the practice operates in). Link works in partnership with a number of subsidiary companies who will also be entitled to purchase services from the Framework Agreement. The subsidiaries of Link Group include C~urb 6 Ltd, Link Living, Horizon Housing Association Ltd, Larkfield Housing Association Ltd and West Highland Housing Association Ltd. Although it is possible that other organisations may join the Group, becoming subsidiary companies, during the term of the Framework Agreement, and may also wish to "call off" from the Framework. Link also works in partnership with several external organisations, refer to Section 1.1 of the Contract Notice for further details, who will also be entitled to purchase services from the Framework Agreement. It is also intended that any Registered Social Landlord registered and operating in Scotland will be entitled to purchase services from the framework, subject to Link's prior agreement. There is no guarantee of any work, however, it is likely that individual commissions will be "called off" either by direct selection or by mini tendering, within the terms of the Framework Agreement, to identify the most economically advantageous tender. The Framework Agreement will mainly cover the provision of Civil & Structural Engineering services for new build housing, however individual projects could include rehabilitation of existing properties, extensions, office accommodation, commercial property, adaptations, and planned maintenance projects. The Framework Agreement may include, where successful Bidders are suitably qualified and experienced, Principal Designer Services on each of the project types listed above. The projects will range in size, tenure and type from mainstream housing to a variety of particular needs housing. The tenure type will cover all affordable tenures, private rented and market sale. Applicants should have experience of projects within the affordable housing sector of between 5 and 500 units including flats, houses and retirement living projects. The location of projects will vary but in the main will be in the Central Belt of Scotland, Argyll & Bute and Highland, however individual projects may be located in any part of Scotland. The total number of units in each of the geographical areas may vary and specific numbers cannot be guaranteed in any area or in total. Although individual projects cannot be guaranteed, Link will expect the successful Engineering Practices to deliver a high quality and value for money service.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (13)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements mentioned in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be a suitably qualified Civil & Structural Engineering Practice.
--Principals within the practice should be members of the Institution of Structural Engineers and Institution of Civil Engineers.
--Practice should be a member of the SER Scheme.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--Provision of Civil & Structural Engineering services.
--Potential provision of Principal Designer services.
--Experience in new build housing projects.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a four-year framework agreement for Civil & Structural Engineering services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The absence of specified disputes or known legal issues contributes positively. However, the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond the CDM regulations and the absence of a reveal date for documents are minor drawbacks.

Clarity80/100

The description of services, including the potential for Principal Designer roles and the types of projects covered, is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-documented. The conditions for subsidiary and external organizations to call off services are also outlined. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specific submission requirements and the absence of content for the attached documents, making it difficult for bidders to fully understand the submission process and expectations.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements mentioned
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a restricted procedure which, when well-managed, can lead to focused competition. The eligibility criteria are objective and based on professional qualifications and experience. The mention of equivalent organizations for international practices enhances fairness. The use of e-procurement is also a positive indicator.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of a document URL for accessing full tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements hinder practicality. While the contract start date is implied by the submission deadline, explicit mention would be beneficial. Financing information is not detailed.

No document URL provided
No specific submission requirements mentioned
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated logically. The dates provided are consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code and NUTS code are also present and appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services and scope
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Use of e-procurement
Objective professional qualification criteria

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of specific submission requirements
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible with content and URLs.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation requirements to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline