Skip to main content
Tenders

Garage renovation, Meža prospekts 1

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168191
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Garage renovation, Meža prospekts 1

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit technical and financial proposals.
--Follow evaluation methods outlined in documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements mentioned.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements mentioned.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168191_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316113038.pdf -- 96.1 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the renovation of garages at the Riga National Zoo, detailing selection criteria, technical and financial proposal submissions, and evaluation methods.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemXLS
Būvniecības apjomu tāme_TS_P2.xlsx -- 43.9 KB

This document contains a cost estimate (tāme) for the renovation of garages at Meža prospekts 1 in Rīga, including a summary of costs.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning garage renovation at Meža prospekts 1, with the submission deadline set for March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for garage renovation is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial requirements, and document access is noted as restricted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could impact legal compliance if it hinders full participation.

Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. The existence of specific requirement documents is indicated, suggesting a structured approach. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria within the provided summary is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a key piece of information for potential bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are notably sparse, indicating that crucial details might be buried within the documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Sparse AI-extracted requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which is a positive indicator of fairness. The AI-extracted requirements do not suggest tailoring to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria can create an uneven playing field.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive sign for practical submission. However, the AI-extracted requirements do not explicitly confirm e-submission, and the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission'. The contract start date is not specified.

Potential lack of e-submission confirmation
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, organization, reference)
Open procedure
Documents are available
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Restricted document access
Sparse AI-extracted requirements

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline