Skip to main content
Tenders

Painting of stadium grandstand metal structures at Sporta iela 7/9, Ventspils

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
169114
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Painting of stadium grandstand metal structures at Sporta iela 7/9, Ventspils

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169114_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324170353.pdf -- 98.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the painting of stadium grandstand metal structures.

Līguma projektsDOC
Līgums_tribīnu krasosana_2026.docx -- 27.0 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the painting of stadium grandstand metal structures, outlining the obligations of both the client and the contractor, payment terms, penalties, and warranty provisions.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem_OCV2026_2_eis.docx -- 870.8 KB

This document contains the regulations and appendices for a tender regarding the painting of stadium grandstand metal structures in Ventspils.

Finanšu piedāvājums_TāmeXLS
Tāme_metal konstrukciju krasošana.xlsx -- 50.1 KB

This document contains a local estimate (tāme) for the anticorrosion treatment and painting of stadium grandstand metal structures in Ventspils, detailing costs based on 2026 market prices.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender regarding the painting of stadium grandstand metal structures in Ventspils, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 16, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for painting stadium grandstand metal structures is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed financial value, which can impact transparency.

Value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear and concise. Key documents like the contract draft, estimate form, and technical specifications are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a clear description of the works. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of essential documents like the contract draft and technical specifications is positive. The main concern is the restricted document access, which could limit full understanding for potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date implied by the submission deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed. The short contract duration of 1 month is practical for the scope.

Financing information not detailed
E-submission mechanism not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Open procurement procedure
Availability of key documents (contract draft, technical specs)
Reasonable submission deadline
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline