Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of construction design and author's supervision for "Raunas Castle Ruins Walking Trail 'PilsTaka'"

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167350
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 15, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical ProposalTechnical
Experience ConfirmationExperience
Personnel InformationTechnical
Financial ProposalPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 15, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of construction design and author's supervision for "Raunas Castle Ruins Walking Trail 'PilsTaka'"
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submission of application.
--Submission of technical and financial proposals.
--Submission of other supporting documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Development of a construction project for the "PilsTaka" walking trail at Raunas Castle ruins.
--Author supervision for the "PilsTaka" walking trail at Raunas Castle ruins.
--Compliance with the Technical Specification attached in Annex 2 of the regulations.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

10.pielikums_Līguma projekts-AutoruzraudzībaDOC
10_pielikums_Liguma projekts_Autoruzraudzība_... -- 128.5 KB

This document contains the draft contract for author's supervision services related to the "PilsTaka" walking trail project at Raunas Castle ruins.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167350_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260315131251.pdf -- 98.2 KB

This document contains the tender requirements for the development and author supervision of the "Raunas Castle Ruins Walking Trail 'PilsTaka'" project by Smiltene Municipality, including application, experience confirmation, personnel information, technical and financial proposals, and other supporting documents.

9.pielikums_Līguma projekts-ProjektēšanaDOC
9_pielikums_Liguma projekts_Projektesana_21AK... -- 171.5 KB

This document contains the draft contract for design services for the "PilsTaka" walking path at Raunas Castle ruins, outlining terms, responsibilities, and payment details.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
NOLIKUMS_PRO_AU_Raunas pilsdrupas_ Pils Taka_... -- 1.1 MB

This document contains the regulations and appendices for an open tender for the development of a construction project and author supervision for the "Rauna Castle Ruins Walking Trail "PilsTaka"" by the Smiltene Municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the development of a construction project and author supervision for the "PilsTaka" walking trail at Raunas Castle ruins, with a submission deadline of April 14, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is active and includes essential details like title, reference, organization, and deadlines. However, it lacks crucial financial information and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. However, the absence of explicit dispute information and the lack of disclosed financial value slightly affect compliance score.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and key requirements like technical specifications are referenced. The contract duration and execution period are specified. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a minor concern for clarity.

Completeness70/100

Basic information and several key documents (contract drafts, regulations) are available. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and financial requirements are missing, significantly impacting completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financial requirements missing
Fairness85/100

The tender uses e-procurement and is EU funded, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential issues, and the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria makes it harder for bidders to assess their chances objectively.

Restricted document access (potential)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

E-procurement is utilized. A contract start date is implied by the contract duration and deadline. Financing information is not provided. The duration is specified as 4 months, with execution within 100 days.

Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which may imply some sustainability aspects, but there are no specific explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

No explicit green procurement requirements
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Active tender with clear title and reference
Uses e-procurement and is EU funded
Key documents (contract drafts, regulations) are attached
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration specified

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed
No explicit evaluation criteria provided
Potential restricted document access
Lack of specific sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Provide clear and objective evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Clarify document access policies to ensure full transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline