Skip to main content
Tenders

GMMH Mobile Voice & Data

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
021426-2026
Value
£220,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£220,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

A Mini Competition for Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust's Mobile Voice & Data Services under RM6261 Lot 2

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for mobile voice and data services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is defined as competitive with negotiation. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without further context on the complexity of the mini-competition.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the general categories of information needed from bidders. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and estimated value. The submission deadline is also specified. However, crucial details such as contract duration and the content of tender documents are missing, hindering a complete understanding of the procurement.

No document content available
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The criteria for evaluation are missing, which, if subjective, could impact fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified deadline. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission details (beyond 'E-Procurement' characteristic) and the missing contract duration reduce its practicality for bidders. The financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Active status with specified deadline
E-Procurement characteristic

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Include details on contract duration and attach full tender documents to improve completeness and practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline