Skip to main content
Tenders

Communication channel provision for video surveillance points

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167916
Value
€41,999
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€41,999
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€220,792
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,497 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Communication channel provision for video surveillance points

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Technical and financial proposal form required (Document 1.1.pielikums_Tehn_fin_pied_CAIP_2026_28).
--Tender requirements outlined in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--Regulations for the public procurement procedure are in "Nolikums_2026_28".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

1.1.pielikums_Tehn_fin_pied_CAIP_2026_28XLS
1.1.pielikums_Tehn_fin_pied_CAIP_2026_28.xlsx -- 30.8 KB

This document contains a technical and financial proposal form for the procurement of communication channels for video surveillance points, ID No. CAIP 2026/28.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167916_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323120107.pdf -- 95.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for providing communication channels for video surveillance points, including selection criteria and technical, financial, and other submission requirements.

Nolikums_2026_28DOC
Nolikums_CAIP_2026_28.docx -- 192.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure concerning the provision of communication channels for video surveillance points.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for a tender concerning the provision of communication channels for video surveillance points, with a deadline for submission of offers on April 8, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for communication channels for video surveillance points is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect legal compliance if interpreted as a lack of transparency in the selection process.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. Key documents outlining requirements are referenced. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes the overall clarity of the selection process less than ideal.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements in the provided summaries, along with the restricted document access, reduces the completeness of the information available to potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Missing specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in summaries
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable. The main concern is the restricted access to documents, which limits full document access for all potential bidders. The absence of specified evaluation criteria also raises questions about objective selection.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of a direct URL for document access and the absence of information regarding financing details and contract start date reduce its practicality.

No e-submission (implied by restricted access/no URL)
No financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable submission deadline
E-procurement utilized
CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements in summaries
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full and open access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Include information on financing and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline