Skip to main content
Tenders

EBC PR Vaux Crescent Play Area Refurbishment

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018789-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 06, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Elmbridge Borough Council is seeking to replace all outdoor play equipment and install new rubber wet pour safety surfacing at Vaux Crescent Play Area. Site visits are expected prior to submission to ensure compliance and value for money.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a detailed response.
--Visit the site prior to submitting a detailed response.
--Ensure compliance and value for money in the response.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Replacement of all outdoor play equipment.
--Installation of new rubber wet pour safety surfacing.
--Must satisfy themselves with replacement requirements by visiting the site prior to submitting a detailed response.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for playground refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear objectives and basic information provided. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods, impacting its overall practicality and transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold open competition. A CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate flags for disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is not explicitly unreasonable for this value and scope.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required work (play equipment replacement and safety surfacing) is clear. The requirement for site visits and innovative responses is also stated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how submissions will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are also specified. However, the lack of content in the tender documents is a significant omission.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The requirement for a site visit is standard for this type of project. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as it leaves room for subjective interpretation.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a deadline and contract start date, and the value is disclosed. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of content in the provided documents significantly hinder practical application for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent with each other.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond a general request for an 'innovative response'. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives
Open competition procedure
Disclosure of estimated value
Provision of CPV code

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Lack of explicit sustainability/social criteria

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Provide full content for all tender documents.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline