Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of Client Support Consultancy Services Framework

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018692-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
96 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
73
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Client Support Consultancy Services Framework for WSCC

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

The tender is generally well-structured with a clear title, reference, and estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting overall clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender seems to follow general procurement principles with a clear procedure type and CPV code. No overt legal compliance issues are flagged directly, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to challenges in demonstrating a fair legal process. The deadline is relatively short but not critically so given the value.

Clarity70/100

The description is brief and repetitive. A major concern is the missing specification of evaluation criteria, which is essential for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of content in the tender documents further hinders clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and start date. However, the absence of any content for the tender documents is a significant omission. The lack of reveal date is also a minor completeness issue.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and the duration is substantial, which can allow for comprehensive proposals. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of an open procedure and disclosure of value contribute to fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender does not specify e-submission, which is a significant drawback for modern procurement. The contract duration and start date are provided, but financing information is missing. The availability of a document URL is not confirmed.

No e-submission specified
Financing information missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates appear logically sequenced. The contract start date follows the submission deadline with an appropriate interval.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score. These aspects are not mandated in all tenders but are becoming increasingly important.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Estimated value and duration specified
Open procedure type indicates broad accessibility
Objective criteria framework outlined (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
No e-submission specified
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Upload the full content of the tender documents.
3. Clarify the e-submission process or integrate it.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline