Skip to main content
Tenders

Supported Living (Lancashire & South Cumbria)

Open
Deadline
2256 days left
May 30, 2032
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
015142-2022
Value
£7,000,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

May 31, 2022

Deadline for Questions

May 23, 2032

Submission Deadline

May 30, 2032

Budget
£7,000,000
Duration
120 months
Location
North West England
Type
Restricted Procedure
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Midlands and Lancashire CSU on behalf of Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board. The ICB is inviting suitably qualified providers of Supported Living to submit an indicative tender to be included in a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the management and service provision of patients requiring NHS funded Supported Living Services.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit an indicative tender for inclusion in the Dynamic Purchasing System.
--Ensure the tender is submitted by the deadline: 2032-05-30 00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Be a suitably qualified provider of Supported Living services.
--Be capable of providing management and service provision for patients requiring NHS funded Supported Living Services.
--Be able to operate within the Lancashire & South Cumbria region.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate expertise and qualifications in providing Supported Living services.
--Demonstrate capability in managing and delivering NHS-funded Supported Living Services.
--Adhere to NHS standards, protocols, and funding mechanisms.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
015142-2022_official.pdf

Qualified providers are invited to submit an indicative tender to join a Dynamic Purchasing System for NHS-funded Supported Living Services in Lancashire & South Cumbria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Supported Living services is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of tender documents and detailed requirements, making it unworkable for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds but provides no details, which is a legal requirement. Crucially, the absence of any evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS is a significant legal compliance failure, hindering transparency and fairness.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Missing evaluation criteria for DPS admission
Clarity40/100

While the service description and region are clear, the eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are excessively vague and generic. This lack of specificity makes it difficult for potential providers to understand what is truly expected.

Vague eligibility requirements
Generic technical capability requirements
Completeness83/100

The tender is severely incomplete, with the most critical issue being the complete absence of any attached tender documents. This means no detailed specifications, terms and conditions, or application instructions are available.

No tender documents attached
No document content available
Fairness80/100

The lack of detailed requirements and, more importantly, the absence of evaluation criteria, severely compromise the fairness of the procurement process. Without objective criteria, the assessment of indicative tenders could be highly subjective and non-transparent.

Missing evaluation criteria
Vague requirements leading to potential subjective assessment
Practicality40/100

It is impractical for bidders to prepare a meaningful 'indicative tender' without any supporting documents, detailed specifications, or clear evaluation criteria. The process, as presented, places an undue burden on bidders to guess requirements.

Impractical for bidders due to lack of documents and clear requirements
Data Consistency100/100

The limited information provided is internally consistent, but the overall lack of detail makes a comprehensive consistency check challenging. The NUTS code being 'N/A' while a region is specified is a minor detail inconsistency.

Sustainability0/100

The tender information indicates no specific focus on green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, representing a missed opportunity to leverage public spending for broader societal benefits.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value disclosed
Use of Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for flexibility
Long contract duration (120 months) for stability

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents
Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Missing evaluation criteria for DPS admission
Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds details
High potential for subjective assessment due to vague requirements

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms, and conditions.
2. Clearly define all eligibility, technical, and financial requirements with objective and measurable criteria.
3. Provide explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds and the full evaluation criteria for DPS admission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline