Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction and renovation of municipal roads in 2026:

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00159326/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction and renovation of municipal roads in 2026:

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de843f-1239-41aa-056e-e500011b6e87.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice from the Municipality of Latowicz for the reconstruction and renovation of municipal roads in 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for municipal road works in Latowicz is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable e-procurement process. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria and contract duration slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly indicate the scope of works. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, suggesting a structured approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity gap.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. Documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are key elements for a complete tender.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration missing
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Requirements are listed generically, without apparent tailoring to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which could be a concern for some bidders, but the overall process appears objective.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission. A contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is also missing, which affects practical planning for bidders.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. No suspension or disputes are noted. The dates are logical, with the submission deadline well before the tender date. The CPV code is appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
E-Procurement enabled
Mandatory requirements listed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline