Skip to main content
Tenders

RENOVATION OF THE PARKING SURFACE OF THE MIKOŁAJ KOPERNIK SCHOOL COMPLEX IN KONIN within the projects "SQUARE IN A NEW LOOK" and "ACCESSIBLE SPACE FOR ALL"

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00172313/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Wielkopolskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Wielkopolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

RENOVATION OF THE PARKING SURFACE OF THE MIKOŁAJ KOPERNIK SCHOOL COMPLEX IN KONIN within the projects "SQUARE IN A NEW LOOK" and "ACCESSIBLE SPACE FOR ALL"

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The attached bill of quantities (TPCR) is auxiliary and does not form the basis for offer valuation.
--Offer submission deadline: 2026-04-10T12:00:00Z
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Performance of design and preparatory works.
--Performance of demolition and construction works on the internal access road.
--Performance of demolition and construction works on the passenger car parking lot.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b0f-aeae-de48-5fad-950001e70ce3.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation of the parking surface at the Mikołaj Kopernik School Complex in Konin, Poland.

STWiOR.pdfPDF
STWiOR.pdf

This document contains the technical specification for the execution and acceptance of works for the renovation of the parking surface at the Mikołaj Kopernik School Complex in Konin.

SWZ.pdfPDF
SWZ.pdf

This document contains the Terms of Reference (SWZ) for the renovation of the parking surface at the Mikołaj Kopernik School Complex in Konin, under the projects 'Square in a New Look' and 'Accessible Space for All'.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for parking surface renovation is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and available documents. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is questionable given the short timeframe. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, outlining the scope of renovation. Technical specifications are provided, and the purpose of the bill of quantities is clarified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed (though not the estimated amount). Criteria are objective in terms of required works, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the submission deadline might be too short for thorough preparation. Financing information and contract start date are not provided, hindering practical planning for bidders.

Deadline may be too short
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the submission deadline in the future.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The sustainability score is low due to the absence of these considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
E-procurement enabled
Comprehensive set of attached documents
CPV code and location information available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to improve transparency.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more thorough bid preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline