Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of surgical and optical instruments

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168038
Value
€1,055,258
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 15, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 15, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,055,258
Duration
24 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of surgical and optical instruments
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-13T10:00:00.
--The tender is for the supply of surgical and optical instruments.
--The tender is an open tender.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Selection criteria are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is divided into 40 positions as specified in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija/Tehniskais-finanšu piedāvājums'.
--Technical specifications are detailed in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija/Tehniskais-finanšu piedāvājums' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Financial proposal details are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
--Financial offer details are provided in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija/Tehniskais-finanšu piedāvājums' document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168038_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260315142336.pdf -- 116.9 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of surgical and optical instruments, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal details.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums.docx -- 103.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the supply of surgical and optical instruments by VSIA "Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca".

Tehniskā specifikācija/Tehniskais-finanšu piedāvājumsXLS
TS_Ķirurģisko un optisko instrumentu piegāde_... -- 348.3 KB

This document contains a technical and financial offer for the supply of surgical and optical instruments, detailing various instrument sets and their respective positions.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the supply of surgical and optical instruments by Paula Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, with a submission deadline of April 13, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for surgical and optical instruments is well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. Key documents are available, but specific evaluation criteria are missing, and document access might be restricted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure with a specified CPV code and EU funding designation. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance flags are evident in the provided information. The use of e-procurement is positive.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like technical specifications and regulations are referenced. However, the explicit criteria for evaluating submissions are not detailed, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Four relevant documents are listed, with summaries provided. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria impacts the completeness of actionable information for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open, promoting competition. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied by technical specifications) are positive. However, the statement 'Restricted document access' raises concerns about full document availability for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as e-procurement, which is a positive step for practical submission. However, the AI extraction notes 'No e-submission' as an issue, which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Clarity on the exact e-submission mechanism and linked URL for all documents is needed.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and follow a standard procurement timeline. CPV and NUTS codes are provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement,' but specific sections for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation are not explicitly mentioned or detailed within the provided summary. This suggests a moderate rather than high focus on these areas.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation

Strengths

Clear estimated value and contract duration.
Open procedure and EU funding noted.
Good data consistency across key fields.
References necessary technical and regulatory documents.

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Potential restricted document access.
Ambiguity regarding e-submission mechanism.

Recommendations

1. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Provide a direct URL for e-submission and clarify the process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline