Skip to main content
Tenders

The University of Bath Supply of Dry Cleaning

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027934-2026
Value
£216,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 11, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£216,000
Duration
12 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Dry cleaning laundry service, per the specification contained within the document pack. For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Bath:-Washing-and-dry-cleaning-services./27WS28Q756 To respond to this opportunity, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/27WS28Q756

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for dry cleaning services by the University of Bath is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and relies heavily on external portals for full documentation access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure, though the submission deadline could be tighter. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the institutional nature of the organization.

Clarity80/100

The description is concise, and the core service is clearly identified. The reference to a 'document pack' and external portals for specifications implies that detailed requirements are available elsewhere, which is standard but requires users to navigate multiple platforms.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and start date. However, the crucial 'document pack' content is not directly available within the tender notice itself, requiring users to access external links. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and criteria are stated to be objective, though not detailed. Reliance on a specific e-procurement portal is standard practice and generally fair, provided access is unrestricted.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes an e-submission process via a specified portal, which is practical. The contract start date and duration are clear. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the reliance on external portals for full document access can be a minor inconvenience.

No e-submission (directly within notice)
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and duration specified
CPV code provided
Open procedure type indicated

Concerns

Lack of explicit evaluation criteria
Full documentation requires external portal access
No sustainability or social criteria mentioned
Potential for short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Include evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or provide direct links to them.
2. Consider adding sustainability and social value considerations to future tenders.
3. Ensure sufficient time is allocated for the submission deadline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline