Skip to main content
Tenders

YPO - 001302 Vehicle Hire, Lease, Purchase and Services Portal

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024703-2026
Value
£100,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 08, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£100,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
71
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

YPO are looking for Suppliers to be appointed onto a Framework Agreement following a Competitive Tendering Procedure for the provision of Vehicle Hire, Lease, Purchase & Services Portal. The Framework is designed to meet the needs of all public sector Contracting Authorities. There will be 4 Lots with a single supplier awarded to each. This will be a contractual arrangement with customers placing orders with the awarded supplier.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a vehicle hire, lease, purchase, and services portal offers a substantial estimated value and clear structure, but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible documentation, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender has a clear open procedure and a proper CPV code. No immediate disputes are indicated. The deadline appears reasonable given the context of a framework agreement. However, the absence of an 'reveal date' and unspecified evaluation criteria could pose minor legal compliance concerns regarding transparency of the process.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity70/100

The description of the framework agreement and its purpose is clear, as are the intended lots. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria means potential bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity. The absence of document content also hinders understanding.

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Completeness65/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the crucial lack of document content and specified evaluation criteria prevents this from being fully complete from a bidder's perspective.

No document content available
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all, and the estimated value is disclosed, contributing to fairness. The criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned. The framework structure with lots is a standard approach. However, the lack of accessible document content and specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less than fully fair if it prevents potential bidders from understanding requirements properly.

Practicality60/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and indicates a significant estimated value. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the unavailability of document URLs significantly hinder practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission (assumed)
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are populated and logical. No issues of suspension or disputes are noted, ensuring good data consistency.

Sustainability40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is also no indication of EU funding. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Substantial estimated value
Clear framework structure with lots
Open procedure for broad participation
All basic information present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of sustainability focus
No explicit e-submission mentioned

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make all tender documents fully accessible and downloadable.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline